A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes

作者: A. Kelly , J. Kevany , M. de Onis , P.M. Shah

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(96)02652-5

关键词:

摘要: To assess the degree to which maternal anthropometric measurements predict and fetal outcomes World Health Organization (WHO) conducted a meta-analysis of 25 studies from 20 developed developing countries covering more than 111000 births. Effect size for each 5 indicators was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) based on frequency outcome occurring in lowest quartile indicator distribution compared with that highest quartile. Attained weight pre-pregnancy through 9 lunar months demonstrated high ORs both low birth (LBW) intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR); most LBW reported is due IUGR rather preterm (PTB). The strongest effect (OR 4.0) provided by attained at 24-28 weeks gestation when applied women below-average weight. This suggests weights taken pre- or early pregnancy 7 are useful IUGR; their ability PTB limited however. Neither height nor arm circumference were effective any analyzed. study 3 weaker. Maternal predictor assisted delivery showed positive OR (1.6) but did not meet screening criteria. These findings suggest single measurement 16-20 practical instrument primary health care settings. At this stage however identification may allow sufficient time be improved food supplementation.

参考文章(16)
M Tashiro, F D Norris, R L Williams, W E Hawes, G C Cunningham, R K Creasy, Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 59, pp. 624- 632 ,(1982)
Carl L. Keen, Calvin C. Willhite, Adrianne Bendich, Maternal nutrition and pregnancy outcome New York Academy of Sciences. ,(1993)
José Villar, JoséM. Belizán, The relative contribution of prematurity and fetal growth retardation to low birth weight in developing and developed societies American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 143, pp. 793- 798 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90012-6
M S Kramer, Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of The World Health Organization. ,vol. 65, pp. 663- 737 ,(1987)
Jean-Pierre Habicht, David L. Pelletier, The importance of context in choosing nutritional indicators. Journal of Nutrition. ,vol. 120, pp. 1519- 1524 ,(1990) , 10.1093/JN/120.SUPPL_11.1519
Jerker Liljestrand, Staffan Bergström, Antenatal Nutritional Assessment: The Value of Upper Arm Circumference Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. ,vol. 32, pp. 81- 83 ,(1991) , 10.1159/000293000
Ingram Olkin, Larry V. Hedges, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis ,(1985)
J. van Roosmalen, R. Brand, Maternal height and the outcome of labor in rural Tanzania. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. ,vol. 37, pp. 169- 177 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0020-7292(92)90377-U
D. B. Paintin, EFFECTIVE CARE IN PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 97, pp. 967- 973 ,(1990) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1990.TB02464.X