“Participating means accepting”: debating and contesting synthetic biology

作者: Morgan Meyer

DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2017.1320942

关键词:

摘要: This article analyses opposition to public debates. In doing so, the builds upon tradition of analyzing controversies by symmetrically describing advocates and opponents First, debates on synthetic biology will be placed in their wider political institutional context. The call for a “serene” debate French authorities retraced its genealogy vis-a-vis previous (i.e. genetically modified organisms (GMOs) nanotechnology) elucidated. then describes how group Pieces et main d’œuvre (PMO) obstructed biology, an obstruction that analyzed mobilizing extending notion divisible versus indivisible conflicts. But also move beyond symmetrical analysis controversy discussing one criticisms raised PMO, some researchers are “sociologists acceptability.” notions divisibility, indivisibility wh...

参考文章(38)
Dominique Vinck, Sociologie des sciences Paris, Armand Colin. pp. 292- ,(1995)
P Macnaghten, J Chilvers, The Future of Science Governance: A review of public concerns, governance and institutional response Sciencewise Expert Resource Centre. ,(2011)
Stephen J. Collier, Andrew Lakoff, On Regimes of Living Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 22- 39 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470696569.CH2
James Wilsdon, Jack Stilgoe, The new politics of public engagement with science Information Sciences. pp. 18- ,(2008)
Claire Marris, Catherine Jefferson, Filippa Lentzos, Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge: The case of dual use and synthetic biology BioSocieties. ,vol. 9, pp. 393- 420 ,(2014) , 10.1057/BIOSOC.2014.32
ALBERT O. HIRSCHMAN, Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society Political Theory. ,vol. 22, pp. 203- 218 ,(1994) , 10.1177/0090591794022002001
Charles Thorpe, Jane Gregory, Producing the Post-Fordist Public: The Political Economy of Public Engagement with Science Science As Culture. ,vol. 19, pp. 273- 301 ,(2010) , 10.1080/09505430903194504