摘要: This article responds to criticisms of the proposals Everett 2005 by Nevins, Pesetsky, and Rodrigues (2009, this issue). It argues that their are unfounded Piraha grammar culture accurately described in 2005. The also offers more detailed argumentation for hypothesis can exert an architectonic effect on grammar. concludes falsifies single prediction made Hauser, Chomsky, Fitch (2002) recursion is essential property human language.
jhu.edu
auf.net 
researchgate.net 参考文章(54)
Bernard Comrie, Edward L. Keenan, Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar ,(2008)
Anthropology of Color : Interdisciplinary Multilevel Modeling John Benjamins Publishing Company. ,(2007) , 10.1075/Z.137
Marian Klamer, A Grammar of Teiwa ,(2010)
Jeffrey Heath, Functional grammar of Nunggubuyu Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. ,(1984)
D Robert, Van Valin, Exploring the syntax-semantics interface ,(2005)
Thomas Givon, Bio-Linguistics: The Santa Barbara lectures ,(2002)
Thomas Givon, The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution ,(2009)
Charlotte Marie Chambelland Galves, Daniel Leonard Everett, A lingua pirahã e a teoria da sintaxe : descrição, perspectiva e teoria Biblioteca Digital da Unicamp. ,(1983)
N. J. Enfield, Ethnosyntax : Explorations in Grammar and Culture ,(2002)