Cross-cultural differences in driver self-assessment

作者: Michael Sivak , José Soler , Ulrich Tränkle

DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90028-6

关键词:

摘要: This study investigated differences in driver self-assessment among U.S., Spanish, and West German drivers. Subjects responded to 14 questions that used five-point semantic scales dealing with performance abilities. Pairs of questions, concerning the same driving-related aspects, differed by requesting a on an absolute basis relation average driver. The subjects all three countries included younger, middle-aged, older drivers both sexes. following are main findings: (1) majority each country rated themselves positively studied; (2) significant effects country, age group, sex were present for several scales; (3) some these remained even after controlling differential driving experience. For example, U.S. assessed as safer than did Spanish subjects, younger less wise middle-aged males more relaxed females.

参考文章(6)
Michael Sivak, José Soler, Ulrich Tränkle, None, Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-taking Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 21, pp. 363- 369 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90027-4
Ola Svenson, Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica. ,vol. 47, pp. 143- 148 ,(1981) , 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6
Judith W. Regan, Holly Gosselink, Janet Hubsch, Elizabeth Ulsh, Do people have inflated views of their own ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 31, pp. 295- 301 ,(1975) , 10.1037/H0076300
Iain A. McCormick, Frank H. Walkey, Dianne E. Green, Comparative perceptions of driver ability— A confirmation and expansion Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 18, pp. 205- 208 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90004-7
Michael Sivak, José Soler, Ulrich Tränkle, Jane Maria Spagnhol, Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-perception Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 21, pp. 355- 362 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90026-2
Jonathon D. Brown, Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments Social Cognition. ,vol. 4, pp. 353- 376 ,(1986) , 10.1521/SOCO.1986.4.4.353