The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement

作者: Victoria Borg Debono , Shiyuan Zhang , Chenglin Ye , James Paul , Aman Arya

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-13

关键词:

摘要: Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are routinely used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses that help inform healthcare policy decision making. The proper reporting of RCTs is important because it acts as a proxy for health care providers researchers to appraise the quality methodology, conduct analysis an RCT. aims this study analyse overall 23 were metaanalysis by assessing 3 key methodological items, determine factors associated with high reporting. It hypothesized studies larger sample sizes, have funding reported, published journals higher impact factor adopted or endorsed CONSORT statement will be better items. Methods: We systematically reviewed within anesthesiology related post-operative pain management meta-analysis. included all used, which parallel design addressed use femoral nerve block improving outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Data abstraction was done independently two reviewers. main were: 1) 15 point score (OQRS) based on Consolidated Standards Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2) item (KMIS) allocation concealment, blinding intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Twenty-three included. median OQRS 9.0 (Interquartile Range=3). A multivariable regression did not show any significant association between KMIS our four predictor variables improve direction magnitude results when compared similar suggest size improved Conclusions: anesthesia meta-analysis poor moderate. information gained from should register urgency clear transparent make literature accessible comparable.

参考文章(63)
Amy C Plint, David Moher, Andra Morrison, Kenneth Schulz, Douglas G Altman, Catherine Hill, Isabelle Gaboury, Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. The Medical Journal of Australia. ,vol. 185, pp. 263- 267 ,(2006) , 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2006.TB00557.X
Julian P. T. Higgins, Sally Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ,(2019)
Karin Huwiler-Müntener, Peter Jüni, Christoph Junker, Matthias Egger, Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. JAMA. ,vol. 287, pp. 2801- 2804 ,(2002) , 10.1001/JAMA.287.21.2801
Larry E. Miller, Morgan E. Stewart, The blind leading the blind: use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials. ,vol. 32, pp. 240- 243 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.CCT.2010.11.004
James E. Paul, Aman Arya, Lindsay Hurlburt, Ji Cheng, Lehana Thabane, Antonella Tidy, Yamini Murthy, Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. ,vol. 113, pp. 1144- 1162 ,(2010) , 10.1097/ALN.0B013E3181F4B18
Riaz Agha, Derek Cooper, Gordon Muir, The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review International Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 413- 422 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.IJSU.2007.06.002
Timothy Y. Y. Lai, Victoria W. Y. Wong, Robert F. Lam, Andy C. O. Cheng, Dennis S. C. Lam, Gabriel M. Leung, Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. ,vol. 14, pp. 390- 398 ,(2007) , 10.1080/09286580701344399
Edward J. Mills, Ping Wu, Joel Gagnier, P.J. Devereaux, The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement Contemporary Clinical Trials. ,vol. 26, pp. 480- 487 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CCT.2005.02.008
Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian, Martin Wiener, Zeiad Alshameeri, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Diana Elbourne, Malcolm W. Reed, Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better? Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 244, pp. 663- 667 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.SLA.0000217640.11224.05
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Julie Pildal, An-Wen Chan, Mette T. Haahr, Douglas G. Altman, Peter C. Gøtzsche, Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 62, pp. 967- 973 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2009.04.003