Risk preferences of Australian academics: where retirement funds are invested tells the story

作者: Pavlo R. Blavatskyy

DOI: 10.1007/S11238-015-9511-2

关键词:

摘要: Risk preferences of Australian academics are elicited by analyzing the aggregate distribution their retirement funds (superannuation) across available investment options. Not more than 10 % invested as if owners maximize expected utility under assumption constant relative risk aversion with an empirically plausible level aversion. An implausibly high is required to rationalize any into bonds when stocks available. 36.54 all investments can be rationalized a model loss averse preferences. Moreover, levels typically reported in experimental studies imply overinvestment bonds, which not observed data. Up 67.18 rank-dependent or Yaari’s (Econometrica 55:95–115 1987) dual parameters. A median academic behaves maximizing parameter \(\gamma \in [0.76, 0.79]\) Tversky and Kahneman (J Uncertain 5:297–323 1992) probability weighting function.

参考文章(28)
Arnaud Reynaud, Stéphane Couture, Stability of risk preference measures: results from a field experiment on French farmers Theory and Decision. ,vol. 73, pp. 203- 221 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11238-012-9296-5
Han Bleichrodt, Jose Luis Pinto, A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis Management Science. ,vol. 46, pp. 1485- 1496 ,(2000) , 10.1287/MNSC.46.11.1485.12086
Pavlo Blavatskyy, Error Propagation in the Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions Theory and Decision. ,vol. 60, pp. 315- 334 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11238-005-4593-X
William M. Goldstein, Hillel J. Einhorn, Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena Psychological Review. ,vol. 94, pp. 236- 254 ,(1987) , 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236
John Watson, Mark McNaughton, Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Expected Retirement Benefits Financial Analysts Journal. ,vol. 63, pp. 52- 62 ,(2007) , 10.2469/FAJ.V63.N4.4749
Pavlo R. Blavatskyy, Back to the St. Petersburg Paradox Management Science. ,vol. 51, pp. 677- 678 ,(2005) , 10.1287/MNSC.1040.0352
Pavlo R. Blavatskyy, Ganna Pogrebna, Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices Theory and Decision. ,vol. 68, pp. 159- 171 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11238-009-9143-5
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. ,vol. 5, pp. 297- 323 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00122574
John Quiggin, RISK PERCEPTION AND THE ANALYSIS OF RISK ATTITUDES Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. ,vol. 25, pp. 160- 169 ,(1981) , 10.1111/J.1467-8489.1981.TB00393.X