Movement, impacts and management of plant distributions in response to climate change: insights from invasions

作者: P. Caplat , P.-O. Cheptou , J. Diez , A. Guisan , B. M. H. Larson

DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-0706.2013.00430.X

关键词:

摘要: Prediction and management of species responses to climate change is an urgent but relatively young research field. Therefore, ecology must by necessity borrow from other fields. Invasion particularly well-suited informing because both invasion address the trajectories rapidly changing novel systems. Here we outline broad range active questions in where can stimulate advances. We present ideas for how concepts, case-studies methodology be adapted improve prediction change. A major challenge this era rapid predict changes distributions their impacts on ecosystems, and, if necessary, recommend strategies maintenance biodiversity or ecosystem services. Biological invasions, studied most biomes world, provide useful analogs some ecological consequences distribution shifts response Invasions illustrate adaptive interactive that occur when are confronted with new environmental conditions. complements provides insights into following questions: 1) will respond change? 2) movement affect recipient ecosystems? And 3) should we, so manage ecosystems face demonstrates a trait-based approach help spread speeds has potential ranges ecosystems. However, there need analyse traits context life-history demography, stage colonisation process (e.g. spread, establishment impact), suitable habitats landscape, abiotic biotic conditions under which those expressed. As case change, embedded within complex societal goals. Both disciplines converge similar 'when intervene?' 'what do?' call better understanding processes social values associated

参考文章(116)
Ian A. Dickie, Gregor W. Yeates, Mark G. St. John, Bryan A. Stevenson, John T. Scott, Matthias C. Rillig, Duane A. Peltzer, Kate H. Orwin, Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, John E. Hunt, Larry E. Burrows, Margaret M. Barbour, Jackie Aislabie, Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade-offs in two woody successions Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 926- 934 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.01980.X
Paul Caplat, Shaun Coutts, Yvonne M. Buckley, Modeling population dynamics, landscape structure, and management decisions for controlling the spread of invasive plants Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 1249, pp. 72- 83 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1749-6632.2011.06313.X
Jörn Pagel, Frank M. Schurr, Forecasting species ranges by statistical estimation of ecological niches and spatial population dynamics Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 21, pp. 293- 304 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2011.00663.X
O. Hoegh-Guldberg, L. Hughes, S. McIntyre, D. B. Lindenmayer, C. Parmesan, H. P. Possingham, C. D. Thomas, Ecology. Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science. ,vol. 321, pp. 345- 346 ,(2008) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1157897
H. G. Baker, Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds.. pp. 147- 168 ,(1965)
Don A. Driscoll, David B. Lindenmayer, Andrew F. Bennett, Michael Bode, Ross A. Bradstock, Geoffrey J. Cary, Michael F. Clarke, Nick Dexter, Rod Fensham, Gordon Friend, Malcolm Gill, Stuart James, Geoff Kay, David A. Keith, Chris MacGregor, Hugh P. Possingham, Jeremy Russel-Smith, David Salt, James E. M. Watson, Dick Williams, Alan York, Resolving conflicts in fire management using decision theory: asset-protection versus biodiversity conservation Conservation Letters. ,vol. 3, pp. 215- 223 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00115.X
James M. Bullock, Steven M. White, Christel Prudhomme, Christine Tansey, Ramón Perea, Danny A. P. Hooftman, Modelling spread of British wind‐dispersed plants under future wind speeds in a changing climate Journal of Ecology. ,vol. 100, pp. 104- 115 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2745.2011.01910.X
MARTIN A. SCHLAEPFER, DOV F. SAX, JULIAN D. OLDEN, The Potential Conservation Value of Non‐Native Species Conservation Biology. ,vol. 25, pp. 428- 437 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2010.01646.X