Predicting shoulder function after constraint-induced movement therapy: a retrospective cohort study
作者： Gunhild Mo Hansen , Susanne Wulff Svendsen , Iris Brunner , Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1440508
关键词:
摘要: Background Several predictors have been associated with upper extremity (UE) recovery after stroke, but characteristics that predict shoulder function constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) not yet identified. Objectives To identify satisfactory in patients reduced at admission to CIMT. Methods One hundred and seventy five were treated using CIMT while a specialized inpatient hospital. Satisfactory was defined according the functional ability scale of Wolf Motor Function test. Predictors identified multivariable logistic regression. Results Better distal arm good proximal on strong function, age time since stroke not. Seventeen percent all CIMT-participants pre-CIMT reached level Discussion A substantial part Intensive training, comprising tasks require both UE may increase potential reserve.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(35)
S.L. Wolf, G. Kwakkel, M. Bayley, M.N. McDonnell, Best practice for arm recovery post stroke: an international application Physiotherapy. ,vol. 102, pp. 1- 4 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.PHYSIO.2015.08.007
Boudewijn Kollen, Gert Kwakkel, Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: A longitudinal prospective study Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. ,vol. 25, pp. 453- 460 ,(2007)
Hirofumi Nakayama, Henrik Stig Jørgensen, Hans Otto Raaschou, Tom Skyhøj Olsen, Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 75, pp. 394- 398 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9
A. Roby-Brami, A. Feydy, M. Combeaud, E. V. Biryukova, B. Bussel, M. F. Levin, Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 107, pp. 369- 381 ,(2003) , 10.1034/J.1600-0404.2003.00021.X
Steven L. Wolf, Carolee J. Winstein, J. Philip Miller, Edward Taub, Gitendra Uswatte, David Morris, Carol Giuliani, Kathye E. Light, Deborah Nichols-Larsen, for the EXCITE Investigators, Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. ,vol. 296, pp. 2095- 2104 ,(2006) , 10.1001/JAMA.296.17.2095
Dorothy F. Edwards, Catherine E. Lang, Joanne M. Wagner, Rebecca Birkenmeier, Alexander W. Dromerick, An Evaluation of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Motor Trials Early After Stroke Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 93, pp. 660- 668 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.APMR.2011.10.005
Joost van Kordelaar, Erwin E. H. van Wegen, Gert Kwakkel, Unraveling the interaction between pathological upper limb synergies and compensatory trunk movements during reach-to-grasp after stroke: a cross-sectional study. Experimental Brain Research. ,vol. 221, pp. 251- 262 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00221-012-3169-6
Liza M. Pain, Ross Baker, Denyse Richardson, Anne M. R. Agur, Effect of trunk-restraint training on function and compensatory trunk, shoulder and elbow patterns during post-stroke reach: a systematic review Disability and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 37, pp. 553- 562 ,(2015) , 10.3109/09638288.2014.932450
Pascal Dimitrov Raytchev, Anissa Bendjeriou, Jean-Pierre Dutasta, Alexandre Martinez, Véronique Dufaud, A New Step Towards Solid Base Catalysis: Azidoproazaphosphatranes Immobilized in Nanopores of Mesoporous Silica Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis. ,vol. 353, pp. 2067- 2077 ,(2011) , 10.1002/ADSC.201100270
Mindy F. Levin, Jeffrey A. Kleim, Steven L. Wolf, What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. ,vol. 23, pp. 313- 319 ,(2009) , 10.1177/1545968308328727