Hebephilia: A Postmortem Dissection.

作者: Patrick Singy

DOI: 10.1007/S10508-015-0542-0

关键词:

摘要: In 2008, the concept of hebephilia, which denotes an erotic preference for “pubescent children,” was suggested by Blanchard and his team inclusion in DSM-5 (Blanchard et al., 2009). Four years later, APA’s Board Trustees opted status quo rejected that proposal. This essay sheds light on reason this rejection. I consider three important questions related to hebephilia: Does hebephilia exist? Is it a disease? And what would have been social consequences including DSM? argue if failed convince others should be included DSM-5, is not because he focused too much first question unable offer convincing answer second one, but made mistake dismissing third one as extraneous. The DSM intended pure research manual, category like cannot evaluated without taking into account its potential forensic impact. part or whole, decision include new diagnostic is, always be, political decision.

参考文章(47)
Patrick Singy, Danger and Difference: The Stakes of Hebephilia History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences. pp. 113- 124 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8_7
Jerome C. Wakefield, The Loss of Grief: Science and Pseudoscience in the Debate over DSM-5’s Elimination of the Bereavement Exclusion History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences. pp. 157- 178 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8_10
Dominic Murphy, Psychiatry in the Scientific Image ,(2006)
Rachel Cooper, Must Disorders Cause Harm? The Changing Stance of the DSM History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences. pp. 83- 96 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8_5
Richard Green, Is pedophilia a mental disorder Archives of Sexual Behavior. ,vol. 31, pp. 467- 471 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1020699013309