Is It Time To Retire the Hybrid Atomic Orbital

作者: Alexander Grushow

DOI: 10.1021/ED100155C

关键词:

摘要: A rationale for the removal of hybrid atomic orbital from chemistry curriculum is examined. Although model does not accurately predict spectroscopic energies, many chemical educators continue to use and teach despite confusion it can cause students. Three arguments retaining in are presented. These then refuted methods teaching without invoking presented show how be removed with little negative effect.

参考文章(14)
Linus Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond ,(1939)
A. W. Potts, T. A. Williams, W. C. Price, Ultra-violet photoelectron data on the complete valence shells of molecules recorded using filtered 30.4 nm radiation Faraday Discussions of The Chemical Society. ,vol. 54, pp. 104- 115 ,(1972) , 10.1039/DC9725400104
Igor V. Alabugin, Mariappan Manoharan, Scott Peabody, Frank Weinhold, Electronic Basis of Improper Hydrogen Bonding: A Subtle Balance of Hyperconjugation and Rehybridization Journal of the American Chemical Society. ,vol. 125, pp. 5973- 5987 ,(2003) , 10.1021/JA034656E
Victor M. S. Gil, Hybridization and Structural Properties Journal of Chemical Education. ,vol. 78, pp. 31- ,(2001) , 10.1021/ED078P31.1
John Morrison Galbraith, On the role of d orbital hybridization in the chemistry curriculum Journal of Chemical Education. ,vol. 84, pp. 783- 787 ,(2007) , 10.1021/ED084P783
Ronald J. Gillespie, Teaching Molecular Geometry with the VSEPR Model Journal of Chemical Education. ,vol. 81, pp. 298- 301 ,(2004) , 10.1021/ED081P298
Gordon H. Purser, Lewis Structures Are Models for Predicting Molecular Structure, Not Electronic Structure Journal of Chemical Education. ,vol. 76, pp. 1013- 1018 ,(1999) , 10.1021/ED076P1013
Michael D. Mosher, Sunil Ojha, Hybridization and Structural Properties A Physical Organic Chemistry Experiment Journal of Chemical Education. ,vol. 75, pp. 888- 890 ,(1998) , 10.1021/ED075P888