Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict

作者: Michael Dambacher , Ronald Hübner

DOI: 10.1007/S00426-014-0542-Z

关键词:

摘要: The negative correlation between speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making is often explained as a tradeoff, where lowered boundaries under time pressure result faster but more error-prone responses. Corresponding implementations sequential sampling models confirmed the success of this account, which has led to prevalent assumption that second component making, efficiency processing, largely independent from temporal demands. To test generality claim, we examined effects on decisions conflict. Data flanker task were fit with model incorporates two successive phases response selection, driven by output an early late stage stimulus respectively. fits revealed canonical decrease increasing pressure. In addition, reduced duration non-decisional processes impaired together subsequent first phase selection. results show relation not only relies strategic adjustment involves variations processing efficiency. findings support recent evidence drift rate modulations simple confirm their validity context complex tasks.

参考文章(64)
Joachim Vandekerckhove, Francis Tuerlinckx, Michael Lee, None, A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making conference cognitive science. pp. 1429- 1434 ,(2008)
T. Gilmour Reeve, Robert W. Proctor, Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective ,(1990)
Eysenck Keane, Cognitive Psychology, 6 Taylor & Francis Group. ,(2012)
J. Richard Simon, The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing Advances in psychology. ,vol. 65, pp. 31- 86 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61218-2
Andreas Voss, Markus Nagler, Veronika Lerche, Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 60, pp. 385- 402 ,(2013) , 10.1027/1618-3169/A000218
Christopher M. Harris, Daniel M. Wolpert, Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning Nature. ,vol. 394, pp. 780- 784 ,(1998) , 10.1038/29528
J. MILLER, G. SPROESSER, R. ULRICH, Constant versus variable response signal delays in speed—accuracy trade-offs: Effects of advance preparation for processing time Attention Perception & Psychophysics. ,vol. 70, pp. 878- 886 ,(2008) , 10.3758/PP.70.5.878
Ronald Hübner, Marco Steinhauser, Carola Lehle, A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review. ,vol. 117, pp. 759- 784 ,(2010) , 10.1037/A0019471