How Partisan Conflict is Better and Worse than Legislative Compromise

作者: D.J. Flynn , Laurel Harbridge

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Aggregate patterns of Congressional evaluations show approval declining as partisan conflict increases. At the same time, citizens favor partisanship by members their own party and outputs that reflect victories. We seek to resolve lingering puzzle from these two findings emphasizing role gridlock. Legislative approaches policymaking may not only cooperation or between sides, but when there is over policy, outcome can be a win for one legislative develop number expectations about how different outcomes will affect public Congress test them with multi-wave survey experiment. Consistent expectations, results indicate resulting in victory one’s boosts relative compromise, gridlock substantially damages approval. reflects strategy rather than ideological disagreements particularly nefarious. Evidence also suggests citizens’ responses vary based on individual-level moderators, including strength partisanship, political knowledge, purity. Our provide rationale why institutional has declined risen, point leaders ought consider both sub-constituencies they are courting whether efforts focus goals likely end gridlock.

参考文章(38)
Daniel M. Butler, Eleanor Neff Powell, Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 76, pp. 492- 505 ,(2014) , 10.1017/S0022381613001436
Alan S. Gerber, Donald P. Green, Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation ,(2012)
Matthew Levendusky, How Partisan Media Polarize America ,(2013)
John D. Wilkerson, E. Scott Adler, Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving ,(2013)
Sean M. Theriault, Party Polarization in Congress ,(2008)
Eric Schickler, Bradley Palmquist, Donald P. Green, Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters ,(2002)