The impact of near-term climate policy choices on technology and emission transition pathways

作者: Jiyong Eom , Jae Edmonds , Volker Krey , Nils Johnson , Thomas Longden

DOI: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2013.09.017

关键词:

摘要: Abstract This paper explores the implications of delays (to 2030) in implementing optimal policies for long-term transition pathways to limit climate forcing 450 ppm CO2e on basis AMPERE Work Package 2 model comparison study. The highlights critical importance period 2030–2050 ambitious mitigation strategies. In this period, most rapid shift low greenhouse gas emitting technology occurs. delayed response emission scenarios, an even faster rate is required compensate additional emissions before 2030. Our physical deployment measures indicate that availability CCS could play a role facilitating attainment goals. Without CCS, other technologies would become extremely high period. Yet presence greatly alleviates challenges particularly after policies, lowering risk goal becomes unattainable. results also highlight important bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage (BECCS), which facilitates energy production negative carbon emissions. If BECCS available, exceed budget mid-term, removing excess long term. Excluding either BE or from portfolio implies reductions need take place much earlier.

参考文章(47)
M. Strubegger, S. Messner, User's Guide for MESSAGE III WP-95-069. ,(1995)
K. Klein Goldewijk, T. Kram, A.F. Bouwman, Intergrated modelling of global environmenthal change : An overview of IMAGE 2.4 Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP). ,(2006)
Leon E. Clarke, James Edmonds, Henry Jacoby, Hugh Pitcher, John Reilly, Richard Richels, Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations U.S. Climate Change Science Program. ,(2007)
Gary Yohe, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Wolfgang Cramer, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Tom Wigley, Avoiding dangerous climate change Cambridge University Press. ,(2006) , 10.2277/0521864712
Enrica De Cian, Valentina Bosetti, Massimo Tavoni, Technology innovation and diffusion in "less than ideal" climate policies: An assessment with the WITCH model Climatic Change. ,vol. 114, pp. 121- 143 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10584-011-0320-5
Volker Krey, Gunnar Luderer, Leon Clarke, Elmar Kriegler, Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios Climatic Change. ,vol. 123, pp. 369- 382 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S10584-013-0947-5
Jasper van Vliet, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation Energy Economics. ,vol. 31, pp. S152- S162 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2009.06.010
Keigo Akimoto, Toshimasa Tomoda, Yasumasa Fujii, Kenji Yamaji, Assessment of global warming mitigation options with integrated assessment model DNE21 Energy Economics. ,vol. 26, pp. 635- 653 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2004.04.021
Henri Waisman, Céline Guivarch, Fabio Grazi, Jean Charles Hourcade, The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight Climatic Change. ,vol. 114, pp. 101- 120 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10584-011-0387-Z