A Single Overnight Stay Is Possible for Most Patients Undergoing Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

作者: Ronney Abaza , Ketul Shah

DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2012.08.067

关键词:

摘要: Objective To evaluate establishment of overnight stay only as sufficient after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Methods Stated benefits minimally invasive surgery include reduced hospitalization, but published hospital stays laparoscopic or are not significantly less than with open surgery. We developed a clinical pathway targeting discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 RPN any complexity. reviewed all RPNs by single surgeon since instituting our pathway, including ambulation and diet the night surgery, avoidance intravenous narcotics drains, catheter removal POD before discharge. Targeted was modified regardless Results A total 150 consecutive patients underwent 160 35 hilar tumors 26 segmental, 33 no artery clamping. Three had solitary kidneys, 8 multiple (range, 2-4) RPNs. Mean patient age 57 years 22-89 years), body mass index 32 kg/m 2 18-54 ). tumor size 3.6 cm 1.0-11.0; median, 3.2 cm), RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location) nephrometry score 4-12; 8). warm ischemia time 12.1 minutes 0-30.0 minutes). preoperative creatinine were 0.9 mg/dL 0.43-2.79 mg/dL) 1.13 0.56-2.93 mg/dL). All ambulated 0. One required one dose narcotic. length 1.1 days, 145 (97%) discharged 1, which 4 (2.7%) readmitted within 30 days. Conclusion Discharge is feasible in most Readmission rate low, indicating that longer admissions may prevent complications when meeting criteria go home POD 1.

参考文章(34)
Paul A Taheri, David A Butz, Lazar J Greenfield, Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission. Journal of The American College of Surgeons. ,vol. 191, pp. 123- 130 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00352-5
Matthew H. Hayn, Thomas Schwaab, Willie Underwood, Hyung L. Kim, RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy BJUI. ,vol. 108, pp. 876- 881 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09940.X
Elias Hyams, Philip Pierorazio, Jeffrey K. Mullins, Maryann Ward, Mohamad Allaf, A comparative cost analysis of robot-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 26, pp. 843- 847 ,(2012) , 10.1089/END.2011.0522
A Mathew, S S Devesa, J F Fraumeni, W-H Chow, Global increases in kidney cancer incidence, 1973-1992. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. ,vol. 11, pp. 171- 178 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00008469-200204000-00010
David C. Miller, John M. Hollingsworth, Khaled S. Hafez, Stephanie Daignault, Brent K. Hollenbeck, Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses: An Emerging Quality of Care Concern? The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 175, pp. 853- 858 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00422-2
Matthew T. Gettman, Michael L. Blute, George K. Chow, Richard Neururer, Georg Bartsch, Reinhard Peschel, Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technique and initial clinical experience with da Vinci robotic system Urology. ,vol. 64, pp. 914- 918 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.06.049
FERNANDO J. KIM, KOON H. RHA, FERNANDO HERNANDEZ, THOMAS W. JARRETT, PETER A. PINTO, LOUIS R. KAVOUSSI, Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy: assessment of complications. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 170, pp. 408- 411 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.JU.0000076017.26789.6A
Asha D. Shah, Ronney Abaza, Clinical pathway for 3-day stay after robot-assisted cystectomy. Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1253- 1258 ,(2011) , 10.1089/END.2011.0035
Jay Simhan, Marc C. Smaldone, Kevin J. Tsai, Daniel J. Canter, Tianyu Li, Alexander Kutikov, Rosalia Viterbo, David Y.T. Chen, Richard E. Greenberg, Robert G. Uzzo, Objective Measures of Renal Mass Anatomic Complexity Predict Rates of Major Complications Following Partial Nephrectomy European Urology. ,vol. 60, pp. 724- 730 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2011.05.030