Background, foreground and nearby matter influence on strong gravitational lenses

作者: M. Jaroszynski , Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2966.2012.21197.X

关键词:

摘要: We investigate strong lensing by non-singular finite isothermal ellipsoids taking into account the influence of matter along line sight and in close lens vicinity. compare three descriptions light propagation: full approach all inhomogeneities rays; single plane approach, where we take neighbours but neglect foreground background objects; approach. In each case, simulate many configurations placing a point source at same redshift different locations inside region surrounded caustics. further analyse four or five images. For every simulated configuration, attempt to fit simplified model using ellipsoid with external shear. The fits obtained are rejected majority cases 95 per cent significance. rejection rate is substantially lower. Also inclusion shear modelling improves chances obtaining acceptable fits, problem not solved completely. quantitative estimates rates models depend on required accuracy models, present few illustrative examples, which show that both rays do have important modelling. also estimate typical value fitted parameters lenses used simulations.

参考文章(28)
Fionn D. Murtagh, Jean-Luc Starck, Astronomical Data Analysis Astronomical Data Analysis. ,vol. 4477, ,(2001)
Peter Schneider, Christopher S. Kochanek, Joachim Wambsganss, Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro Saas-Fee Advanced Course 33: Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro. ,(2006) , 10.1007/978-3-540-30310-7
Paul Bode, Joachim Wambsganss, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Gravitational Lensing in a Concordance ΛCDM Universe: The Importance of Secondary Matter along the Line of Sight The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 635, ,(2005) , 10.1086/498976
Stefan Hilbert, Ewald Puchwein, Cluster strong lensing in the Millennium simulation: the effect of galaxies and structures along the line-of-sight Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ,vol. 398, pp. 1298- 1308 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2966.2009.15227.X
C. R. Keeton, C. S. Kochanek, Determining the Hubble constant from the gravitational lens PG-1115+080 The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 487, pp. 42- 54 ,(1997) , 10.1086/304583
D. Walsh∗, R. F. Carswell†, R. J. Weymann‡, 0957 + 561 A, B: twin quasistellar objects or gravitational lens? Nature. ,vol. 279, pp. 381- 384 ,(1979) , 10.1038/279381A0
P. Young, J. E. Gunn, J. B. Oke, J. A. Westphal, J. Kristian, Q0957+561: Detailed models of the gravitational lens effect The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 244, pp. 736- 755 ,(1981) , 10.1086/158751
Sabino Matarrese, Carlo Baccigalupi, Volker Springel, Matthias Bartelmann, Carmelita Carbone, Full-sky maps for gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ,vol. 388, pp. 1618- 1626 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2966.2008.13544.X
Peter Schneider, Achim Weiss, Light propagation in inhomogeneous universes The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 327, pp. 526- 543 ,(1988) , 10.1086/166214
C. S. Kochanek, J. Apostolakis, The two-screen gravitational lens Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ,vol. 235, pp. 1073- 1109 ,(1988) , 10.1093/MNRAS/235.4.1073