Mammal responses to spatial pattern in fire history depend on landscape context

作者: Julian Di Stefano , Holly Sitters , Lauren Delaney

DOI: 10.1007/S10980-020-01186-3

关键词:

摘要: Interactions between multiple threats are driving biodiversity loss. In human-modified landscapes, the extent to which fire regimes threaten species may depend on configuration of native vegetation in relation matrix other land uses. Despite crucial implications for management, interactions spatial pattern history and unstudied. We used a multi-scale analysis address two questions: do mammals respond landscape-context effect older or growth-stage diversity? If so, responses influenced by presence matrix? Camera traps were survey fragmented heathy woodland southeast Australia. quantified percent vegetation, diversity using 16 concentric circles centred sites, examined species’ generalised linear models. modelled eight found five availability. Four (three macropods yellow-footed antechinus, Antechinus flavipes) responded positively when was absent vice versa, indicating that acquire different resources from growth stages absence matrix. Moreover, these results suggest prescribed create mosaic at scales 80–710 ha have positive conservation outcomes species. Our study highlights importance examining consequences interacting threats. Consideration landscape context management lead better landscapes.

参考文章(83)
Dimitrios Rizopoulos, ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Theory Analyses Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 17, pp. 1- 25 ,(2006)
Kevin McGarigal, Barbara J. Marks, FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service. ,vol. 351, pp. 122- ,(1995) , 10.2737/PNW-GTR-351
Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Dale G. Nimmo, Euan G. Ritchie, Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances Biological Conservation. ,vol. 190, pp. 60- 68 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.05.013
Heather Bird Jackson, Lenore Fahrig, Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 24, pp. 52- 63 ,(2015) , 10.1111/GEB.12233
José D. Ordóñez-Gómez, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Sergio Nicasio-Arzeta, Jurgi Cristóbal-Azkarate, Which is the appropriate scale to assess the impact of landscape spatial configuration on the diet and behavior of spider monkeys American Journal of Primatology. ,vol. 77, pp. 56- 65 ,(2015) , 10.1002/AJP.22310
Angie Haslem, Luke T. Kelly, Dale G. Nimmo, Simon J. Watson, Sally A. Kenny, Rick S. Taylor, Sarah C. Avitabile, Kate E. Callister, Lisa M. Spence-Bailey, Michael F. Clarke, Andrew F. Bennett, Habitat or fuel? Implications of long‐term, post‐fire dynamics for the development of key resources for fauna and fire Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 247- 256 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2010.01906.X
Elena N. Ieno, Anatoly A. Saveliev, Neil P. J. Walker, Graham M. Smith, Alain F. Zuur, Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R ,(2009)
Dimitris Rizopoulos, ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Analysis Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 17, pp. 1- 25 ,(2006) , 10.18637/JSS.V017.I05