Production of exotic fish and Brazilian hybrids in similar conditions: Are there considerable differences of environmental performance?

作者: Everton Vogel , Michel Decian , Marcelo Corrêa da Silva , Juliana Carrijo Mauad , Tarcila Souza de Castro Silva

DOI: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2019.734422

关键词:

摘要: Abstract In developing countries and tropical regions, earthen ponds have become an alternative for farming fish inland. Farmers usually restrict diet to compound feed, which is a relevant source of environmental impact. the conditions described above, motivation this study was evaluate impact developed with different species. We evaluated systems producing exotic Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), local hybrid Patinga (Piaractus mesopotamicus x Piaractus brachypomus) Surubim (Pseudoplatystoma sp. Leiarius marmoratus). Species were bred separately, in same farm similar conditions. The also inspired by opportunity properly pinpointing most reasons explain variability performance among For goal, we used Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) technique, preparing our inventory collecting realistic data, on farm, restricting evaluation from cradle-to-farmgate. Distinctive many simulations literature, determined nitrogen (N) phosphorus (P) content feed bromatology Lab. To produce 1 ton live weight, performed considerably better than all categories evaluated. Compared Patinga, two categories: water dependence land occupation. No considerable differences observed between hybrids. global warming potential, acidification potential eutrophication production stages that contributed most. general, protein predominant Indeed, terrestrial animal co-products more embodied resources their tissue, due diversifying reasonably low conversion rates However, discussion spans towards trade-offs puzzling situation decision making. This includes tunneling waste aquaculture instead dumping it landfill, or increasing demand marine ingredients overbalancing some direction. At time, pathway sustainability relies finding managing genetic resource order improve rates, empower speed up production. sure, these tasks efforts meet nutrient requirements offer suitable composition. Overall, methodology presented can be compare demystify performances resources.

参考文章(61)
Patrik John Gustav Henriksson, Jeroen Bartholomeus Guinée, Reinout Heijungs, Arjan De Koning, Darren Michael Green, None, A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data—including estimates for uncertainty International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 19, pp. 429- 436 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11367-013-0647-4
M. Besson, H. Komen, J. Aubin, I. J. M. de Boer, M. Poelman, E. Quillet, C. Vancoillie, M. Vandeputte, J. A. M. van Arendonk, Economic values of growth and feed efficiency for fish farming in recirculating aquaculture system with density and nitrogen output limitations: a case study with African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 92, pp. 5394- 5405 ,(2014) , 10.2527/JAS.2014-8266
Clandio F Ruviaro, Miguelangelo Gianezini, Fernanda S Brandão, César A Winck, Homero Dewes, None, Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 28, pp. 9- 24 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.10.015
Rosamond L. Naylor, Rebecca J. Goldburg, Jurgenne H. Primavera, Nils Kautsky, Malcolm C. M. Beveridge, Jason Clay, Carl Folke, Jane Lubchenco, Harold Mooney, Max Troell, Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies Nature. ,vol. 405, pp. 1017- 1024 ,(2000) , 10.1038/35016500
James S. Diana, Hillary S. Egna, Thierry Chopin, Mark S. Peterson, Ling Cao, Robert Pomeroy, Marc Verdegem, William T. Slack, Melba G. Bondad-Reantaso, Felipe Cabello, Responsible Aquaculture in 2050: Valuing Local Conditions and Human Innovations Will Be Key to Success BioScience. ,vol. 63, pp. 255- 262 ,(2013) , 10.1525/BIO.2013.63.4.5
Claude E. Boyd, Guidelines for aquaculture effluent management at the farm-level Aquaculture. ,vol. 226, pp. 101- 112 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00471-X
Elias Papatryphon, Jean Petit, Sadasivam J. Kaushik, Hayo M. G. van der Werf, Environmental Impact Assessment of Salmonid Feeds Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. ,vol. 33, pp. 316- 323 ,(2004) , 10.1579/0044-7447-33.6.316
M. Besson, J. Aubin, H. Komen, M. Poelman, E. Quillet, M. Vandeputte, J.A.M. van Arendonk, I.J.M. de Boer, Environmental impacts of genetic improvement of growth rate and feed conversion ratio in fish farming under rearing density and nitrogen output limitations Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 116, pp. 100- 109 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.12.084
Patrik J. G. Henriksson, Andreu Rico, Wenbo Zhang, Sk. Ahmad-Al-Nahid, Richard Newton, Lam T. Phan, Zongfeng Zhang, Jintana Jaithiang, Hai M. Dao, Tran M. Phu, David C. Little, Francis J. Murray, Kriengkrai Satapornvanit, Liping Liu, Qigen Liu, M. Mahfujul Haque, Froukje Kruijssen, Geert R. de Snoo, Reinout Heijungs, Peter M. van Bodegom, Jeroen B. Guinée, Comparison of Asian Aquaculture Products by Use of Statistically Supported Life Cycle Assessment Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 49, pp. 14176- 14183 ,(2015) , 10.1021/ACS.EST.5B04634