Beyond safety and efficacy: sexuality-related priorities and their associations with contraceptive method selection

作者: Jenny A. Higgins , Kelsey Q. Wright , David K. Turok , Jessica N. Sanders

DOI: 10.1016/J.CONX.2020.100038

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objectives Sexuality-related preferences have been understudied in contraceptive selection and uptake. Investigators endeavored to assess among patients selecting new methods at family planning clinics evaluate the degree which two sexuality-related are (a) valued (b) associated with method selection. Study design Data were derived from HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative, a longitudinal cohort nested quasi-experimental, observational study enrolling 18–45-year-old four health centers County. At time of their choice, participants reported importance nine factors selection, including preferences: method's lack impact on libido its sexual interruption. Analyses involved multinomial logistic regression selected as outcome, main explanatory variables, range controls covariates. Results Among 2188 individuals seeking methods, most frequently cited quite or extremely important safety (98%), effectiveness (94%), not interrupting sex (81%), impacting (81%) side effects (80%). Less included partner acceptability (46%), hormones (39%), friend recommendation (29%) alignment religious beliefs (11%). Multivariate models documented no significant associations between sexual-related priorities Conclusions Many seekers rank alongside efficacy very important, but align people's priorities. Implications Since endorse (impact libido, interruption) efficacy, research, counseling care should attend sexuality.

参考文章(22)
Jenny A. Higgins, Kristin Ryder, Grace Skarda, Erica Koepsel, Eliza A. Bennett, The Sexual Acceptability of Intrauterine Contraception: A Qualitative Study of Young Adult Women Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. ,vol. 47, pp. 115- 122 ,(2015) , 10.1363/47E4515
Andrea M. Isidori, Carlotta Pozza, Katherine Esposito, Dario Giugliano, Susanna Morano, Linda Vignozzi, Giovanni Corona, Andrea Lenzi, Emmanuele A. Jannini, Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. ,vol. 7, pp. 1139- 1146 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01635.X
Lauren N. Lessard, Deborah Karasek, Sandi Ma, Philip Darney, Julianna Deardorff, Maureen Lahiff, Dan Grossman, Diana Greene Foster, Contraceptive Features Preferred by Women At High Risk of Unintended Pregnancy Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. ,vol. 44, pp. 194- 200 ,(2012) , 10.1363/4419412
CHRISTINE DEHLENDORF, COLLEEN KRAJEWSKI, SONYA BORRERO, Contraceptive Counseling: Best Practices to Ensure Quality Communication and Enable Effective Contraceptive Use Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 57, pp. 659- 673 ,(2014) , 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000059
Tina R. Raine, Anne Foster-Rosales, Ushma D. Upadhyay, Cherrie B. Boyer, Beth A. Brown, Abby Sokoloff, Cynthia C. Harper, One-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptives. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 117, pp. 363- 371 ,(2011) , 10.1097/AOG.0B013E31820563D3
Jenny A. Higgins, Jennifer S. Hirsch, Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use. American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 98, pp. 1803- 1813 ,(2008) , 10.2105/AJPH.2007.115790
Aleksandar Štulhofer, Vesna Buško, Pamela Brouillard, Development and Bicultural Validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale Journal of Sex Research. ,vol. 47, pp. 257- 268 ,(2010) , 10.1080/00224490903100561
Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G. Conde, Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support Journal of Biomedical Informatics. ,vol. 42, pp. 377- 381 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JBI.2008.08.010
Lawrence J. Severy, Susan Newcomer, Critical Issues in Contraceptive and STI Acceptability Research Journal of Social Issues. ,vol. 61, pp. 45- 65 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.0022-4537.2005.00393.X