The Effects of Group Discussion on Eyewitness Accuracy

作者: Dell H. Warnick , Glenn S. Sanders

DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1980.TB00707.X

关键词:

摘要: Previous research on group performance in judgmental tasks reveals that groups are rarely inferior, and often superior, to the average individual. The present study examined whether this pattern of results extends accuracy eyewitness reports a crime. It was found discussion led accounts were significantly more accurate than A requirement reach unanimous decision did not alter any effects discussion. Group superiority especially clear terms completeness estimations duration incident. considered implications for current practice prohibiting as an aid preparation testimony.

参考文章(7)
Glenn S. Sanders, Dell Warnick, Some conditions maximizing eyewitness accuracy: A learning/memory analogy Journal of Criminal Justice. ,vol. 8, pp. 395- 403 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0047-2352(80)90115-4
Evan Brown, Kenneth Deffenbacher, William Sturgill, Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 62, pp. 311- 318 ,(1977) , 10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.311
Roy S. Malpass, Jerome Kravitz, Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 13, pp. 330- 334 ,(1969) , 10.1037/H0028434
Ernest J. Hall, Jane S. Mouton, Robert R. Blake, Group Problem Solving Effectiveness under Conditions of Pooling vs. Interaction Journal of Social Psychology. ,vol. 59, pp. 147- 157 ,(1963) , 10.1080/00224545.1963.9919420
Roger Brown, David McNeill, The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. ,vol. 5, pp. 325- 337 ,(1966) , 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3
J L Tapp, Psychology and the Law: an Overture Annual Review of Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 359- 404 ,(1976) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.PS.27.020176.002043
Felice J. Levine, June Louin Tapp, Psychology of Criminal Identification: The Gap From Wade to Kirby University of Pennsylvania Law Review. ,vol. 121, pp. 1079- ,(1973) , 10.2307/3311282