Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spasticity: Historical Approaches, Current Status, and Future Directions

作者: Sean J. Nagel , Saul Wilson , Michael D. Johnson , Andre Machado , Leonardo Frizon

DOI: 10.1111/NER.12591

关键词:

摘要: Introduction Millions of people worldwide suffer with spasticity related to irreversible damage the brain or spinal cord. Typical antecedent events include stroke, traumatic injury, and cord although insidious onset is also common. Regardless cause, resulting leads years disability reduced quality life. Many treatments are available manage spasticity; yet each fraught drawbacks including incomplete response, high cost, limited duration, dose-limiting side effects, periodic maintenance. Spinal stimulation (SCS), a once promising therapy for spasticity, has largely been relegated permanent experimental status. Methods In this review, our goal document critique history assess development SCS as treatment lower limb spasticity. By incorporating recent discoveries insights gained from early pioneers in field, we intend lay groundwork needed propose testable hypotheses future studies. Results SCS tested over 25 different conditions since potentially beneficial effect was first reported 1973. However, lack fully formed understanding pathophysiology archaic study methodology, technological limitations implantable hardware limit validity many studies. offers measure control that cannot be duplicated other interventions. Conclusions With improved energy-source miniaturization, tailored algorithms, novel implant design, clearer picture poised reintroduce test population.

参考文章(94)
A. Koulousakis, U. Buchhaas, K. Nittner, Application of SCS for movement disorders and spasticity. Acta Neurochirurgica. ,vol. 39, pp. 112- 116 ,(1987) , 10.1007/978-3-7091-8909-2_29
J. Broseta, G. Garcia-March, M. J. Sánchez-Ledesma, J. Barberá, J. González-Darder, High-Frequency Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation in Spasticity and Motor Disorders Acta Neurochirurgica. ,vol. 39, pp. 106- 111 ,(1987) , 10.1007/978-3-7091-8909-2_28
Marc D. Binder, C. G. Heckman, Randall. K. Powers, Relative Strengths and Distributions of Different Sources of Synaptic Input to the Motoneurone Pool Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 508, pp. 207- 212 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-0713-0_25
Giancarlo Barola, K. Singh-Sahni, William E. Staas Jr., Deborah Shatin, Beth Ketcik, Kathy Allen, Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Spasms in Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Study Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. ,vol. 64, pp. 153- 164 ,(1995) , 10.1159/000098744
Robert M. Levy, Progress in the Technology of Neuromodulation: The Emperor's New Clothes? Neuromodulation. ,vol. 16, pp. 285- 291 ,(2013) , 10.1111/NER.12103
J. Gybels, D. Van Roost, Spinal cord stimulation for spasticity. Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery. ,vol. 15, pp. 63- 96 ,(1987) , 10.1007/978-3-7091-6984-1_3
Richard T Katz, W Zev Rymer, None, Spastic hypertonia: mechanisms and measurement Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 70, pp. 144- 155 ,(1989) , 10.5555/URI:PII:0003999389901342
Jeremy A. Bamford, Vivian K. Mushahwar, Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury Progress in Brain Research. ,vol. 194, pp. 227- 239 ,(2011) , 10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00004-2
Allison Hyngstrom, Michael Johnson, Jenna Schuster, C. J. Heckman, Movement-related receptive fields of spinal motoneurones with active dendrites. The Journal of Physiology. ,vol. 586, pp. 1581- 1593 ,(2008) , 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2007.149146