Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a randomized clinical trial.
作者： John A. Rock , Carol A. Bergquist , Allyn W. Kimball , Howard A. Zacur , Theodore M. King
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3
关键词:
摘要: Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope 36). The study design called for the randomization patients within pairs, which were matched method and site anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P 0.39) 24 0.37) after procedure.
elsevier.com
fertstert.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(5)
John A. Rock, Carol A. Bergquist, Howard A. Zacur, Tim H. Parmley, David S. Guzick, Howard W. Jones, Tubal anastomosis following unipolar cautery Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 37, pp. 613- 618 ,(1982) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46270-9
R.M.L. Winston, MICROSURGICAL TUBOCORNUAL ANASTOMOSIS FOR REVERSAL OF STERILISATION The Lancet. ,vol. 309, pp. 284- 285 ,(1977) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(77)91827-X
Brooks Pg, Magnification systems alternative to the operating microscope. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 265- 268 ,(1980)
Howard W. Jones, John A. Rock, On the Reanastomosis of Fallopian Tubes After Surgical Sterilization Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 29, pp. 702- 704 ,(1978) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43350-9
Victor Gomel, Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: a reappraisal. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 33, pp. 587- 597 ,(1980) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44769-2