‘Can you pass the salt?’ The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech

作者: Matthew D. Stephen

DOI: 10.1177/1354066114563417

关键词:

摘要: This article introduces the concept of indirect speech and shows what it can contribute to understanding ‘legitimacy talk’ regarding international institutions. Indirect occurs when one kind illocutionary act is used communicate another. Examples include euphemism, some forms politeness a request expressed as question (‘Can you pass salt?’). Transporting concepts from pragmatics sociolinguistics, this argues that legitimacy talk often serves function in politics, operating by expressing specific requests form more generalized claims. Understanding double role sheds light on otherwise puzzling empirical phenomena, such why states frame their demands terms they are transparently self-serving, with different interests nonetheless express same terms, persist doing so long after there any realistic hope being ‘persuasive...

参考文章(79)
Frank Nullmeier, Henning Schmidtke, Political Valuation Analysis and the Legitimacy of International Organizations German policy studies. ,vol. 7, pp. 117- ,(2011)
Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics ,(2002)
Brent E. Sasley, Theorizing States’ Emotions International Studies Review. ,vol. 13, pp. 452- 476 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1468-2486.2011.01049.X
Nico Krisch, Nico Krisch, The Security Council and the Great Powers Social Science Research Network. ,(2008)
Michael Zürn, Matthew Stephen, The View of Old and New Powers on the Legitimacy of International Institutions Politics. ,vol. 30, pp. 91- 101 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1467-9256.2010.01388.X