Cervical preparation using laminaria with adjunctive buccal misoprostol before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures: A randomized clinical trial

作者: Alison B. Edelman , John G. Buckmaster , Martha F. Goetsch , Mark D. Nichols , Jeffrey T. Jensen

DOI: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2005.08.016

关键词:

摘要: Objective This study was undertaken to determine whether buccal misoprostol improves cervical preparation achieved with laminaria before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures. Study design A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative overnight either placebo or 400 μg approximately 90 minutes surgical abortion. Block randomization used provide balanced enrollment into 2 separate gestational age groups: early (13-15 6/7 ) mid (16-20 second trimester. Surgeons tested maximal by inserting the largest dilator that could be passed through os without force. Subject demographics preprocedure symptoms were tracked. Results Groups similar in regard age, gravity, parity, delivery type, age. Data analyzed from 125 women 13 15 (30 misoprostol, 32 placebo) 16 20 (31 groups. Overall, treatment did not improve initial mean alone (46.0 ƒr ± 5.0; 45.0 6.2, P = .68) (50.9 5.6, 48.9 5.2, .16) However, a subanalysis gestations 19 weeks more demonstrated significantly greater group (53.6 5.3, 48.5 5.0, .01). Subjects receiving reported cramping than those 25/30, 83%; 17/32, 53%, .02; 16-20 week 25/31, 81%, 16/32, 50%, .02). Conclusion Cervical is augmented more, but earlier gestations. Misoprostol causes abdominal cramping.

参考文章(19)
Stanley K. Henshaw, Factors Hindering Access to Abortion Services Family Planning Perspectives. ,vol. 27, pp. 54- 87 ,(1995) , 10.2307/2135905
Laura MacIsaac, Daniel Grossman, Elizabeth Balistreri, Philip Darney, A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion ☆ Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 93, pp. 766- 770 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00493-1
Amy M. Autry, Ellen C. Hayes, Gavin F. Jacobson, Russell S. Kirby, A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 187, pp. 393- 397 ,(2002) , 10.1067/MOB.2002.123887
Kevin S. Oppegaard, Mikael Abdelnoor, Britt-Ingjerd Nesheim, Fridtjof Jerve, Anne Eskild, The use of oral misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: a randomised controlled trial of 400 versus 200 μg in first trimester pregnancies British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 111, pp. 154- 159 ,(2004) , 10.1046/J.1471-0528.2003.00045.X
Eric A. Schaff, Robert DiCenzo, Stephen L. Fielding, Comparison of misoprostol plasma concentrations following buccal and sublingual administration. Contraception. ,vol. 71, pp. 22- 25 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2004.06.014
Premila W. Ashok, Haitham Hamoda, Fatima Nathani, Gillian M.M. Flett, Allan Templeton, Randomised controlled study comparing oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to surgical termination of pregnancy British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 110, pp. 1057- 1061 ,(2003) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2003.03115.X
David A Grimes, Kenneth F Schulz, Willard J Cates, Prevention of Uterine Perforation During Curettage Abortion JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 251, pp. 2108- 2111 ,(1984) , 10.1001/JAMA.1984.03340400036021
D SCHNEIDER, R HALPERIN, R LANGER, E CASPI, I BUKOVSKY, Abortion at 18-22 weeks by laminaria dilation and evacuation. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 88, pp. 412- 414 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00170-6
P HO, S NGAI, K LIU, G WONG, S LEE, Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy* Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 90, pp. 735- 738 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00419-5
Catherine S. Todd, Maria Soler, Laura Castleman, M.Katherine Rogers, Paul D. Blumenthal, Buccal misoprostol as cervical preparation for second trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. ,vol. 65, pp. 415- 418 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00306-2