Is the script concordance test a valid instrument for assessment of intraoperative decision-making skills?

作者: Sarkis Meterissian , Brent Zabolotny , Robert Gagnon , Bernard Charlin

DOI: 10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2006.10.012

关键词:

摘要: Background: Intraoperative decision making requires both knowledge and experience. The script concordance test (SCT), based on cognitive psychology theory, is a new tool of clinical-reasoning assessment that may be used to evaluate candidate’s approach ill-defined problems encountered in the operating room. Methods: To develop validate an SCT for intraoperative making. One hundred questions were prepared objectives residency training American Board Surgery. These reviewed face content validity by 3 board-certified general surgeons. was administered 36 surgical residents ranging from R1 R5. scoring grid obtained giving 10 surgeons who completed independently. Aggregate used. After question optimization, final statistical analysis composed 62 questions. Results: had excellent reliability (Cronbach , .85). Scores increased with higher levels except small decrease R5 scores (R1, 52.5 9.9; R2, 62.4 5.1; R3, 68.3 9.2; R4, 75.7 9.6; R5, 68 6.4) There significant difference between junior (R1 R2) senior (R3 R4 R5) residents: 56.8 9.5 versus 70.2 8.8 (P .0001). Conclusions: SCT, applied clinical judgment, can discriminate successfully residents. Results must compared present gold standard, oral examination, better determine its place as tool. © 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.

参考文章(10)
H G Schmidt, G R Norman, H P Boshuizen, A cognitive perspective on medical expertise Academic Medicine. ,vol. 65, pp. 611- 21 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00001888-199010000-00001
John J. Norcini, Judy A. Shea, Susan C. Day, The Use of Aggregate Scoring for a Recertifying Examination Evaluation & the Health Professions. ,vol. 13, pp. 241- 251 ,(1990) , 10.1177/016327879001300207
G. R. NORMAN, Objective measurement of clinical performance Medical Education. ,vol. 19, pp. 43- 47 ,(1985) , 10.1111/J.1365-2923.1985.TB01137.X
Bernard Charlin, Jacques Tardif, Henny P. A. Boshuizen, Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 75, pp. 182- 190 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00020
Bernard Charlin, Louise Roy, Carlos Brailovsky, Francois Goulet, Cees van der Vleuten, The Script Concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 189- 195 ,(2000) , 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5
J. GRANT, P. MARSDEN, Primary knowledge, medical education and consultant expertise. Medical Education. ,vol. 22, pp. 173- 179 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1365-2923.1988.TB00002.X
Louis Sibert, Bernard Charlin, Jacques Corcos, Robert Gagnon, Philippe Grise, Cees van der Vleuten, None, Stability of clinical reasoning assessment results with the Script Concordance test across two different linguistic, cultural and learning environments. Medical Teacher. ,vol. 24, pp. 522- 527 ,(2002) , 10.1080/0142159021000012599
Bernard Charlin, Cees van der Vleuten, Standardized Assessment of Reasoning in Contexts of Uncertainty The Script Concordance Approach Evaluation & the Health Professions. ,vol. 27, pp. 304- 319 ,(2004) , 10.1177/0163278704267043