Population Differentiation: Measures

作者: Stefano Mona , Giorgio Bertorelle

DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.A0005456.PUB3

关键词:

摘要: The genetic divergence between populations or accumulated by a single population from an ancestral group can be quantified using different measures. None of them considered better than others in all respects. type marker(s) gene(s) analysed, the temporal scale and level variation are differentially affecting quality index, standardisation for comparisons across groups species is important. Some commonly used measures differentiation briefly discussed, it argued that these related quantities to estimate crucial evolutionary demographic parameters such as times migration rates, identify genes affected natural artificial selection processes. Key Concepts: Several computed their comparison may provide useful insights into history populations. Fst indices moment estimators measure degree differentiation. Fst multi-allelic markers usually under-estimates differentiation; some alternative do not show this behaviour. Measures define conservation units. Differentiation both detect genomic regions under selection. The Lewontin–Krakauer tests based on idea loci showing particularly high low values have been shaped selective processes. Demographic estimated likelihood/Bayesian methods. Keywords: population structure; Fst; genetic distance; divergence time; migration; selection; genomics

参考文章(30)
Jonathan K. Pritchard, Anna Di Rienzo, Adaptation – not by sweeps alone Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 11, pp. 665- 667 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NRG2880
Dennis Ensing, Paulo A. Prodöhl, Philip McGinnity, Patrick Boylan, Niall O’Maoiléidigh, Walter W. Crozier, Complex pattern of genetic structuring in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) of the River Foyle system in northwest Ireland: disentangling the evolutionary signal from population stochasticity Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 1, pp. 359- 372 ,(2011) , 10.1002/ECE3.32
JOOST A. M. RAEYMAEKERS, LUC LENS, FREDERIK VAN den BROECK, STEFAN VAN DONGEN, FILIP A. M. VOLCKAERT, Quantifying population structure on short timescales. Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 21, pp. 3458- 3473 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2012.05628.X
D. B. Goldstein, A. Ruiz Linares, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, M. W. Feldman, Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 92, pp. 6723- 6727 ,(1995) , 10.1073/PNAS.92.15.6723
Joshua M Akey, Ge Zhang, Kun Zhang, Li Jin, Mark D Shriver, Interrogating a High-Density SNP Map for Signatures of Natural Selection Genome Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 1805- 1814 ,(2002) , 10.1101/GR.631202
Mark A. Beaumont, Adaptation and speciation: what can Fst tell us? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 20, pp. 435- 440 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2005.05.017
Grant Hamilton, Mathias Currat, Nicolas Ray, Gerald Heckel, Mark Beaumont, Laurent Excoffier, Bayesian estimation of recent migration rates after a spatial expansion Genetics. ,vol. 170, pp. 409- 417 ,(2005) , 10.1534/GENETICS.104.034199
L Excoffier, T Hofer, M Foll, Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population. Heredity. ,vol. 103, pp. 285- 298 ,(2009) , 10.1038/HDY.2009.74
Mark A. Beaumont, David J. Balding, Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 13, pp. 969- 980 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2004.02125.X
Gordon Luikart, Phillip R England, None, Statistical analysis of microsatellite DNA data Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 14, pp. 253- 256 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01632-8