Defensive Venoms: Is Pain Sufficient for Predator Deterrence?

作者: Crystal N. Niermann , Travis G. Tate , Amber L. Suto , Rolando Barajas , Hope A. White

DOI: 10.3390/TOXINS12040260

关键词:

摘要: Pain, though unpleasant, is adaptive in calling an animal's attention to potential tissue damage. A long list of animals representing diverse taxa possess venom-mediated, pain-inducing bites or stings that work by co-opting the pain-sensing pathways enemies. Typically, such venoms include toxins cause damage disrupt neuronal activity, rendering painful honest indicators harm. But could pain alone be sufficient for deterring a hungry predator? Some venomologists have argued "no"; predators, absence injury, would "see through" bluff but otherwise benign sting bite. Because most algogenic are also toxic (although not vice versa), it has been difficult disentangle relative contributions each component predator deterrence. Southern grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus) voracious predators arthropods, feeding on diversity scorpion species whose vary painfulness, including Arizona bark scorpions (Centruroides sculpturatus) and essentially painless stripe-tailed (Paravaejovis spinigerus). Moreover, southern evolved resistance lethal venom, from these harmless. Results series laboratory experiments demonstrate matter. Grasshopper preferred prey rather than when both sting; preference disappeared had their stingers blocked. therefore appears necessary deter mouse, may always sufficient: after first attacking consuming scorpion, many went attack, kill, eat even was capable stinging. Defensive result neurological dysfunction may, thus, required condition greater aversion causing alone.

参考文章(74)
Stephen M. Secor, Jessica A. Wooten, Christian L. Cox, Effects of meal size, meal type, and body temperature on the specific dynamic action of anurans Journal of Comparative Physiology B-biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology. ,vol. 177, pp. 165- 182 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S00360-006-0119-2
Craig A. Barnett, John Skelhorn, Melissa Bateson, Candy Rowe, Educated predators make strategic decisions to eat defended prey according to their toxin content Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 418- 424 ,(2012) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARR206
Leslie V. Boyer, Andreas A. Theodorou, Robert A. Berg, Joanne Mallie, Ariana Chávez-Méndez, Walter García-Ubbelohde, Stephen Hardiman, Alejandro Alagón, Antivenom for Critically Ill Children with Neurotoxicity from Scorpion Stings The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 360, pp. 2090- 2098 ,(2009) , 10.1056/NEJMOA0808455
J. J. Wright, Adaptive significance of venom glands in the tadpole madtom Noturus gyrinus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) The Journal of Experimental Biology. ,vol. 215, pp. 1816- 1823 ,(2012) , 10.1242/JEB.068361
Sharon A. Jansa, Robert S. Voss, Adaptive Evolution of the Venom-Targeted vWF Protein in Opossums that Eat Pitvipers PLoS ONE. ,vol. 6, pp. e20997- ,(2011) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0020997
Ashlee H. Rowe, Yucheng Xiao, Joseph Scales, Klaus D. Linse, Matthew P. Rowe, Theodore R. Cummins, Harold H. Zakon, Isolation and Characterization of CvIV4: A Pain Inducing α- Scorpion Toxin PLoS ONE. ,vol. 6, pp. e23520- ,(2011) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0023520
Carlos Santibáñez-López, Oscar Francke, Carolina Ureta, Lourival Possani, Scorpions from Mexico: From Species Diversity to Venom Complexity. Toxins. ,vol. 8, pp. 2- ,(2015) , 10.3390/TOXINS8010002
Bryan G. Fry, Ivan Koludarov, Timothy N. W. Jackson, Mandë Holford, Yves Terrat, Nicholas R. Casewell, Eivind A. B. Undheim, Irina Vetter, Syed A. Ali, Dolyce H. W. Low, Kartik Sunagar, CHAPTER 1:Seeing the Woods for the Trees: Understanding Venom Evolution as a Guide for Biodiscovery Royal Society of Chemistry. ,vol. 42, pp. 1- 36 ,(2015) , 10.1039/9781849737876-00001
John Skelhorn, Christina G. Halpin, Candy Rowe, Learning about aposematic prey Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 27, pp. 955- 964 ,(2016) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARW009