作者: Matteo Simbula
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Environmental planning, oriented towards recognising “natural, historic and cultural values” throughout the territory, tests innovative techniques methods based on convergence of expert local knowledge which creates an overall context used to evaluate compatibility transformation carried out. To this, criteria is applied long-term in sustainable use resources effective developmental planning territory. The environmental approach therefore able interface scientific, technical other knowledge, facilitating ethical decision making process order reach agreement. The conflict between fragmentation unequivocal position environment plurality proposals for or requires reflection a concise vision values. Experience park has helped developing this theme, above all light innovations introduced by law 394/1991 have required critical re-evaluation “planning view” regarding problems. In particular, nature substitution impressed as opposed types (urban, territorial, environmental, landscape planning) seems imply need create, every protected area, instrument manage As far possible should be able, one hand systematise interdisciplinary summary coherently effect multiple norms afferent various disciplinary components. The experience repeatedly highlighted codify new paradigms o recognition, interpretation values consequent issues environment. inadequacy traditional methodological apparatus – urban instruments, manifests itself, these cases, problem using zoning paradigm assess complexity phenomenon. Problems present themselves following system networks pinpoint boundaries areas where action needs taken conserve protect landscape, acts guarantee variety abundance fauna flora at same time guaranteeing economical development. case centres, characteristics, places, architecture identifying signs social productive spaces incentives provided coherent policies protection redevelopment encourage use, compatible with conservation historical values. Based considerations, thesis uses informative geographic analytical basis. This reveals systemic interaction natural components man construction environments highlights how them. For purpose SIT was out highlight sensitivity anthropological activity allowing sharing contextual plan monitor interventions considered admissible sensitive