Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data

作者: Elena Moreno-Amat , Rubén G. Mateo , Diego Nieto-Lugilde , Naia Morueta-Holme , Jens-Christian Svenning

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2015.05.035

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Maximum entropy modeling (Maxent) is a widely used algorithm for predicting species distributions across space and time. Properly assessing the uncertainty in such predictions non-trivial requires validation with independent datasets. Notably, model complexity (number of parameters) remains major concern relation to overfitting and, hence, transferability Maxent models. An emerging approach validate cross-temporal using paleoecological data. In this study, we assess effect on performance projections time two European plant ( Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Corylus avellana L.) an extensive late Quaternary fossil record Spain as study case. We fit 110 models different levels under present tested AUC (area receiver operating characteristic curve) AICc (corrected Akaike Information Criterion) through standard procedure randomly partitioning current occurrence then compared these results by projecting mid-Holocene (6000 years before present) climatic conditions their ability predict pollen presence–absence abundance. find that calibrating default settings result generation overly complex While increased when distributions, it was higher intermediate distributions. Hence, resulted best trade-off Reliable temporal especially relevant forecasting future climate change. Consequently, species-specific tuning should be control complexity, notably data independently projections. For which not available, selected.

参考文章(53)
P. Savill, Alnus Mill. - Alder. The silviculture of trees used in British forestry. pp. 29- 38 ,(2013) , 10.1079/9781780640266.0029
Nicholas W Synes, Patrick E Osborne, None, Choice of predictor variables as a source of uncertainty in continental‐scale species distribution modelling under climate change Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 20, pp. 904- 914 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2010.00635.X
Diego Nieto-Lugilde, Kaitlin C. Maguire, Jessica L. Blois, John W. Williams, Matthew C. Fitzpatrick, Close agreement between pollen-based and forest inventory-based models of vegetation turnover Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 24, pp. 905- 916 ,(2015) , 10.1111/GEB.12300
Richard G. Pearson, Christopher J. Raxworthy, Miguel Nakamura, A. Townsend Peterson, Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar Journal of Biogeography. ,vol. 34, pp. 102- 117 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1365-2699.2006.01594.X
Michael R. Kearney, Brendan A. Wintle, Warren P. Porter, Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conservation Letters. ,vol. 3, pp. 203- 213 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00097.X
Charles B. Yackulic, Richard Chandler, Elise F. Zipkin, J. Andrew Royle, James D. Nichols, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Sophie Veran, Presence‐only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences? Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 4, pp. 236- 243 ,(2013) , 10.1111/2041-210X.12004
Peter B. Pearman, Christophe F. Randin, Olivier Broennimann, Pascal Vittoz, Willem O. van der Knaap, Robin Engler, Gwenaelle Le Lay, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Antoine Guisan, Prediction of plant species distributions across six millennia. Ecology Letters. ,vol. 11, pp. 357- 369 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2007.01150.X