Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Implications for Credit Unions

作者: David J Reiss

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: This research brief provides an overview of the role Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in housing finance market a framework which reform options for two companies can be evaluated. These include return to pre-crisis status quo; move redirect income affordable goals; nationalization; privatization. The evaluates number concrete proposals through lens these four options, including those Credit Suisse, Mortgage Bankers Association, Housing Policy Council Financial Services Roundtable, Center American Progress e21.The also highlights impact that would have on credit unions other small financial institutions. ultimately concludes should privatized, benefits produce residential mortgage maintained alternative means, regulation, consumer protection legislation increased subsidies housing.

参考文章(12)
Dwight M. Jaffee, Dwight M. Jaffee, Reforming Fannie and Freddie Social Science Research Network. ,(2009)
Michael A. Crew, Charles K. Rowley, Dispelling the Disinterest in Deregulation The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. pp. 163- 178 ,(1988) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-1963-5_14
Michael A. Crew, Charles K. Rowley, Feasibility of Deregulation: A Public Choice Analysis Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 5- 20 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4684-6897-7_2
Diana Hancock, Wayne Passmore, Three Initiatives Enhancing the Mortgage Market and Promoting Financial Stability B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. ,vol. 9, pp. 1- 25 ,(2009) , 10.2202/1935-1682.2226
James B. Lockhart, Steven T. Walther, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ,(2009)
Stephen G. Breyer, Regulation and its reform ,(1982)
Jonathan G. S. Koppell, The Politics of Quasi-Government Cambridge Books. ,(2006)
Kathleen C. Engel, Patricia A. McCoy, Turning a Blind Eye: Wall Street Finance of Predatory Lending Fordham Law Review. ,vol. 75, pp. 2039- ,(2007)