Automatic EEG spike detection: what should the computer imitate?

作者: W.R.S. Webber , B. Litt , R.P. Lesser , R.S. Fisher , I. Bankman

DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90149-P

关键词:

摘要: We conducted a study to explore how electroencephalographers (EEGers) read EEGs and reach clinical impressions based upon them. Eight EEGers rule-based computerized "spike" detector marked epileptiform discharges ("EDs") in 12 test records. Of all events, 18% were by readers 38% only one reader. Readers agreed on basic features of the records, such as whether record demonstrated EDs, rank order ED sources location, ranking records number EDs detected. consistent pattern that was independent an objective measure expertise experience. Our had lower sensitivity selectivity than human readers, but either parameter could be adjusted comparable at expense other. propose employ reproducible, quantitatively different styles reading EEG tracings qualitatively similar impressions. In practice, are not absolutely defined, appear represent continuum activity which lends itself better description ordering absolute quantitation. More just counting successful should adaptable style individual help them efficiently formulate their

参考文章(15)
Bruce L Ehrenberg, J Kiffin Penry, Computer recognition of generalized spike-wave discharges. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 41, pp. 25- 36 ,(1976) , 10.1016/0013-4694(76)90212-1
Jean Gotman, Li-Yan Wang, State dependent spike detection: validation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 83, pp. 12- 18 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90127-4
Wayne E Hostetler, Herbert J Doller, Richard W Homan, None, Assessment of a computer program to detect epileptiform spikes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1- 11 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90126-3
J Gotman, P Gloor, N Schaul, Comparison of traditional reading of the EEG and automatic recognition of interictal epileptic activity Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 44, pp. 48- 60 ,(1978) , 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90104-9
SAMUEL C. LITTLE, SHERMAN C. RAFFEL, Intra-rater reliability of EEG interpretations. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. ,vol. 135, pp. 77- 81 ,(1962) , 10.1097/00005053-196207000-00010
G. W. Williams, H. O. Luders, A. Brickner, M. Goormastic, D. W. Klass, Interobserver variability in EEG interpretation Neurology. ,vol. 35, pp. 1714- 1714 ,(1985) , 10.1212/WNL.35.12.1714
EDWARD E. HOUFEK, ROBERT J. ELLINGSON, On the reliability of clinical EEG interpretation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. ,vol. 128, pp. 425- 437 ,(1959) , 10.1097/00005053-195905000-00006
John S. Barlow, Computerized Clinical Electroencephalography in Perspective IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. ,vol. BME-26, pp. 377- 391 ,(1979) , 10.1109/TBME.1979.326416
A.S. Gevins, C.L. Yeager, S.L. Diamond, J. Spire, G.M. Zeitlin, A.H. Gevins, Automated analysis of the electrical activity of the human brain (EEG): A progress report Proceedings of the IEEE. ,vol. 63, pp. 1382- 1399 ,(1975) , 10.1109/PROC.1975.9966