作者: John Williams , Jamie Pittock , C Max Finlayson , Richard H Norris , Nick Schofield
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: The objectives of the new water-sharing plan for the Murray–Darling Basin Plan are set out in the Water Act 2007 (Cwlth); cardinal among these objectives is the maximisation of economic, social and environmental outcomes for the Australian community (Water Act 2007, ss. 3 [c] and [d][iii], s. 20 [d]). Meeting this objective requires an extensive process of biophysical modelling and economic analysis of the costs and benefits associated with resetting the balance among multiple water users, including the environment. Maximising net benefits applies to plan development where implementation can be thought of as a two-stage process: a) establishing long-term sustainable diversion limits (SDLs) that set the overall balance of water available for the environment versus consumptive uses; b) developing basin-level plans for environmental watering, water quality, accreditation, and water-trading rules. Included in this is the design of mechanisms and incentives to incorporate basin-wide targets and goals into State water-sharing plans and operational delivery mechanisms.The Guide to the proposed Basin Plan (MDBA 2010), released on 8 October 2010, could be interpreted as the first stage in this process of establishing a feasible range of long-term reductions in diversions. The framework for assessing the balance among consumptive users and the environment in the Guide involves weighing the cost to irrigated agriculture in terms of forgone production, including the potential flow-on impacts to employment and irrigation-dependent communities, and a comparison of these with the potential benefits derived from ecological responses to various …