作者: Eric R Helms , Alyssa-Joy Spence , Colby Sousa , James Krieger , Steve Taylor
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: BackgroundA goal of many who perform resistance training (RT) is to increase muscle mass and strength. An energy surplus is commonly advised to support such gains; however, if too large, it could cause unwanted fat gain without augmenting adaptation. Thus, we randomized 21 trained lifters into maintenance energy (MAIN), 5%(MOD), and 15%(HIGH) energy surplus groups while performing RT 3d/wk for eight weeks to determine if skinfold thicknesses (ST), squat and bench one-repetition maximum (1-RM), or biceps brachii or quadriceps muscle thicknesses (MT) were influenced by group assignment. COVID-19 complications reduced our ability to recruit and retain participants, leaving 17 completers. Thus, in addition to Bayesian ANCOVA group comparisons, we regressed outcomes against body mass (BM) changes to analyze the relationship between BM gain, ST increases, and increase in 1-RM and MT. For all outcomes we reported Bayes Factors (BF 10) indicating the odds ratio of the likelihood of one hypothesis relative to another (eg, a BF 10= 2 indicates the hypothesis is twice as likely as another) and coefficients of determination (R 2) for regressions.ResultsANCOVAs provided no evidence in support of the group model for MT or squat 1-RM. However, there was moderate (BF 10= 9.9) and strong evidence (BF 10= 14.5) that MOD increased bench 1-RM more than HIGH and MAIN, respectively. Further, there was moderate evidence (BF 10= 4.2) MOD increased ST more than MAIN and weak evidence (BF 10= 2.4) HIGH increased ST more than MAIN. The regression provided strong evidence that BM changes predicted changes in …