Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.

作者: Ralf Buergers , Wulf Schneider-Brachert , Sebastian Hahnel , Martin Rosentritt , Gerhard Handel

DOI: 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2008.07.011

关键词: Streptococcus mutansMaterials scienceMethacrylateStreptococcus sanguinisStreptococcus gordoniiComposite materialStreptococcus oralisSurface roughnessDental restorationAdhesion

摘要: Abstract Objectives The aim of the present study was to compare susceptibility one novel silorane-based and four widely used conventional methacrylate-based resin composites adhere oral streptococci relate any differences surface roughness, hydrophobicity type matrix. Methods Specimens restoratives Filtek Silorane, Z250, Tetric EvoCeram, Quixfil Spectrum TPH were prepared (10.0-mm diameter, 2.0-mm height). Surface roughness assessed by perthometer measurements according water contact angles determined computerized image analysis. Bacterial suspensions Streptococcus oralis , sanguinis gordonii mutans incubated for 2.5 h at 37 °C with 15 test specimens each material adhesion quantified fluorescence dye Alamar Blue/Resazurin an automated multi-detection reader. Glass served as reference. Statistical analysis performed using Mann–Whitney U -test ( α  = 0.05). Results Median values all ranged between 0.04 0.11 μm, median 59.7° 92.1°. Significantly lowest intensities materials found on Silorane three streptococcal strains. methacrylate significantly higher comparable among other. Significance When compared against composite resins, a general significance lower quantity adhering resin, which might result from its increased hydrophobicity. low potential may potentially improve longevity direct fillings reduce recurrent caries.

参考文章(38)
M. Grivet, J. J. Morrier, G. Benay, O. Barsotti, Effect of hydrophobicity on in vitro streptococcal adhesion to dental alloys. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 11, pp. 637- 642 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1008913915399
M V Lancaster, R D Fields, Dual-attribute continuous monitoring of cell proliferation/cytotoxicity. American biotechnology laboratory. ,vol. 11, pp. 48- 50 ,(1993)
R. L TAYLOR, J VERRAN, G. C LEES, A. J. P WARD, The influence of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion to polymethyl methacrylate. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 17- 22 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008874326324
Guggenberger R, Weinmann W, Exploring beyond methacrylates. American Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 13, ,(2000)
P E Kolenbrander, J London, Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. Journal of Bacteriology. ,vol. 175, pp. 3247- 3252 ,(1993) , 10.1128/JB.175.11.3247-3252.1993
Madilyn Fletcher, 8 Methods for Studying Adhesion and Attachment to Surfaces Methods in Microbiology. ,vol. 22, pp. 251- 283 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70245-9
S. Sardin, J.-J. Morrier, G. Benay, O. Barsotti, In vitro streptococcal adherence on prosthetic and implant materials. Interactions with physicochemical surface properties Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. ,vol. 31, pp. 140- 148 ,(2004) , 10.1046/J.0305-182X.2003.01136.X
J.D. de Stoppelaar, J. van Houte, Backer Dirks, The relationship between extracellular polysaccharide-producing streptococci and smooth surface caries in 13-year-old children. Caries Research. ,vol. 3, pp. 190- 199 ,(1969) , 10.1159/000259582