Drivers of synchronized vigilance in wild boar groups

作者: Tomasz Podgórski , Sanne de Jong , Jakub W. Bubnicki , Dries P.J. Kuijper , Marcin Churski

DOI: 10.1093/BEHECO/ARW016

关键词: Risk factor (computing)Food competitionBiologySet (psychology)PopulationSynchronizationPredationDemographyVigilance (behavioural ecology)EcologyContext (language use)Animal Science and ZoologyEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

摘要: There is a growing evidence that members of animal groups synchronize their vigilance behavior to minimize predation risk. Because synchronized deviates from the classical models, which assume independent scanning, it important understand when and why occurs. We explored wild boar (Sus scrofa) in population subject spatial variation human hunting risk seasonal food availability. Group behavior. hypothesized synchronization would be context dependent trade-off between energy gain safety shape relationship degree group size. predicted weaker large under heavy risk, due benefits numerical dilution, stronger limiting, intense competition. The decreased with increasing size area where added another factor natural predation, pointing at synchrony for small role human-induced shaping synchrony. found no relation scarce, winter season. However, low levels its observed indicated was prioritized over safety. Thus, can adjust depending on forage-risk set by ecological context.

参考文章(47)
W. N. Venables, B. D. Ripley, Modern Applied Statistics with S Springer. ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Marco Apollonio, Bogumiła Jędrzejewska, Ilpo Kojola, Ungulate-large carnivore relationships in Europe. Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. pp. 284- 318 ,(2010) , 10.1017/CBO9780511974137.011
Douglas M. Bates, Josae C. Pinheiro, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS ,(2000)
Etienne Sirot, Negotiation may lead selfish individuals to cooperate: the example of the collective vigilance game. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 279, pp. 2862- 2867 ,(2012) , 10.1098/RSPB.2012.0097
GILBERT ROBERTS, Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 51, pp. 1077- 1086 ,(1996) , 10.1006/ANBE.1996.0109
Bogumiła Jędrzejewska, Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Aleksei N. Bunevich, Lech Miłkowski, Zbigniew A. Krasiński, Factors shaping population densities and increase rates of ungulates in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland and Belarus) in the 19th and 20th centuries Acta Theriologica. ,vol. 42, pp. 399- 451 ,(1997) , 10.4098/AT.ARCH.97-39
P. A. Bednekoff, S. L. Lima, Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 265, pp. 2021- 2026 ,(1998) , 10.1098/RSPB.1998.0535
Steven L. Lima, Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 124, pp. 303- 316 ,(1987) , 10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80118-2