On the Similarities of Some Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis Methods

作者: Jutta Geldermann , Anita Schöbel

DOI: 10.1002/MCDA.468

关键词: Multiple criteriaField (computer science)Multicriteria decisionDecision problemManagement scienceOperations researchWeightingComputer scienceMultiple-criteria decision analysis

摘要: Since multiple criteria characterise many practical decision problems, the research field of multicriteria analysis (MCDA) is flourishing. This paper compares multi-attribute making (MADM) methods, simple additive rating (SAR), weighting (SAW) as well outranking approach PROMETHEE and explains their similarities. We present a case study on industrial paint application provide theoretical evidence that can mimic other MADM algorithms. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(52)
Otto Rentz, Jutta Geldermann, Multi‐criteria Analysis for Technique Assessment:Case Study from Industrial Coating Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 9, pp. 127- 142 ,(2005) , 10.1162/1088198054821591
TJ Stewart, A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE Omega-international Journal of Management Science. ,vol. 20, pp. 569- 586 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0305-0483(92)90003-P
Thomas L. Saaty, Luis G. Vargas, Decision making with the analytic network process Operations Research and Management Science. ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7
Paul Slovic, Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 36, ,(1985)
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk Econometrica. ,vol. 47, pp. 263- 291 ,(1979) , 10.2307/1914185
Robert Stück, Martin Burger, Thorsten Hohage, The iteratively regularized Gauss–Newton method with convex constraints and applications in 4Pi microscopy Inverse Problems. ,vol. 28, pp. 015012- ,(2012) , 10.1088/0266-5611/28/1/015012
Elizabeth C. Hirschman, Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 20, pp. 217- ,(1983) , 10.2307/3151689