When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

作者: Thomas L. Saaty , Daji Ergu

DOI: 10.1142/S021962201550025X

关键词: Decision making methodsManagement scienceMultiple-criteria decision analysisTrustworthinessOrder (exchange)ScrutinyComputer scienceDecision problemMulti criteria decision

摘要: Decision makers often face complicated decision problems with intangible and conflicting criteria. Numerous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been proposed to handle the measurement of priorities tangible/intangible criteria in turn use them choose best alternative for a decision. However, presence many MCDM bewilders users. The existence these becomes problem itself, may be uncertain about which one use. Thus comparative analysis evaluation various has come under scrutiny by both researchers practitioners order discover if there are logical, mathematical, social or practical reasons why method is better than another. Criteria their first important issue that needs resolved. In this paper, 16 introduced used judge evaluate methods. some guidelines given help readers

参考文章(65)
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Zenonas Turskis, A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making Technological and Economic Development of Economy. ,vol. 16, pp. 159- 172 ,(2010) , 10.3846/TEDE.2010.10
C. M. Tam, Thomas K. L. Tong, Arthur W. T. Leung, Gerald W. C. Chiu, Site layout planning using nonstructural fuzzy decision support system Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce. ,vol. 128, pp. 220- 231 ,(2002) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:3(220)
C. West Churchman, Russell L. Ackoff, An Approximate Measure of Value Journal of the Operations Research Society of America. ,vol. 2, pp. 172- 187 ,(1954) , 10.1287/OPRE.2.2.172
Gang Kou, Yanqun Lu, Yi Peng, Yong Shi, None, EVALUATION OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS USING MCDM AND RANK CORRELATION International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. ,vol. 11, pp. 197- 225 ,(2012) , 10.1142/S0219622012500095
János Aczél, Fred S. Roberts, On the possible merging functions Mathematical Social Sciences. ,vol. 17, pp. 205- 243 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0165-4896(89)90054-1
Kirti Peniwati, Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods Mathematical and Computer Modelling. ,vol. 46, pp. 935- 947 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.MCM.2007.03.005
Gang Kou, Daji Ergu, Jennifer Shang, Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 236, pp. 261- 271 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EJOR.2013.11.035
J T Buchanan, A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: the GUESS method Journal of the Operational Research Society. ,vol. 48, pp. 202- 206 ,(1997) , 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JORS.2600349
David L Olson, Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 130, pp. 576- 587 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00416-6