Striking differences in individual anticonvulsant response to phenobarbital in rats with spontaneous seizures after status epilepticus.

作者: Claudia Brandt , Holger A. Volk , Wolfgang Loscher

DOI: 10.1111/J.0013-9580.2004.16904.X

关键词: KindlingSedativeAnticonvulsantAnesthesiaPhenobarbitalHypnoticMedicineStatus epilepticusEpilepsy syndromesEpilepsy

摘要: Summary: Purpose: More than one third of patients with epilepsy have inadequate control seizures drug therapy, but mechanisms intractability are largely unknown. Because this large number pharmacoresistant epilepsy, the existing process antiepileptic (AED) discovery and development must be reevaluated a focus on preclinical models therapy-resistant syndromes such as mesial temporal lobe (TLE). However, although various rodent TLE available, pharmacoresponsiveness most is not well known. In present study, we used post–status epilepticus model to examine whether rats spontaneous recurrent (SRSs) differ in their individual responses phenobarbital (PB). Methods: Status was induced Sprague–Dawley by prolonged electrical stimulation basolateral amygdala. Once had developed SRSs, seizure frequency severity were determined continuous EEG/video recording over 6-week period (i.e., predrug 2 weeks, followed PB treatment for postdrug weeks). administered twice daily at maximal tolerated doses. Results: Analysis plasma concentrations showed that within therapeutic range (10–40 μg/ml) maintained all throughout treatment. six (55%) 11 rats, complete achieved, another rat exhibited >90% reduction frequency. These seven considered responders. The remaining four (36%) either no response (n = 3) or only moderate therefore nonresponders. Plasma did between these two groups rats. Conclusions: data demonstrate that, similar SRSs markedly AED Pharmacoresistant selected from may provide unique study pharmacoresistance identify novel AEDs treating currently controlled therapies.

参考文章(30)
F.Edward Dudek, Jennifer L. Hellier, Philip A. Williams, Damien J. Ferraro, Kevin J. Staley, The course of cellular alterations associated with the development of spontaneous seizures after status epilepticus Progress in Brain Research. ,vol. 135, pp. 53- 65 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)35007-6
Wolfgang Löscher, Animal models of drug-resistant epilepsy. Novartis Foundation symposium. ,vol. 243, pp. 149- 166 ,(2002) , 10.1002/0470846356.CH11
Ilo E. Leppik, Intractable Epilepsy in Adults Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 7 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-1335-3_1
Wolfgang Löscher, Heidrun Potschka, Role of Multidrug Transporters in Pharmacoresistance to Antiepileptic Drugs Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. ,vol. 301, pp. 7- 14 ,(2002) , 10.1124/JPET.301.1.7
Patrick Kwan, Martin J. Brodie, Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 342, pp. 314- 319 ,(2000) , 10.1056/NEJM200002033420503
Michael A. Rogawski, Wolfgang Löscher, The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. ,vol. 5, pp. 553- 564 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NRN1430
Avinash Prasad, John M. Williamson, Edward H. Bertram, Phenobarbital and MK-801, but not phenytoin, improve the long-term outcome of status epilepticus. Annals of Neurology. ,vol. 51, pp. 175- 181 ,(2002) , 10.1002/ANA.10085
Wolfgang Löscher, Dieter Schmidt, New horizons in the development of antiepileptic drugs Epilepsy Research. ,vol. 50, pp. 3- 16 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0920-1211(02)00063-3
A. R. Bolanos, M. Sarkisian, Y. Yang, A. Hori, S. L. Helmers, M. Mikati, P. Tandon, C. E. Stafstrom, G. L. Holmes, Comparison of valproate and phenobarbital treatment after status epilepticus in rats. Neurology. ,vol. 51, pp. 41- 48 ,(1998) , 10.1212/WNL.51.1.41
Mohamad A. Mikati, Gregory L. Holmes, Antonia Chronopoulos, Pamela Hyde, Samuel Thurber, Arkadi Gatt, Zhao Liu, Suzanne Werner, Carl E. Stafstrom, Phenobarbital modifies seizure‐related brain injury in the developing brain Annals of Neurology. ,vol. 36, pp. 425- 433 ,(1994) , 10.1002/ANA.410360314