CHAPTER 9 – Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Source Imaging

作者: Jeffrey David Lewine , William W. Orrison

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-8151-6509-5.50013-8

关键词: Magnetic resonance imagingPsychologyMagnetoencephalographyEmission computed tomographyDistortionMagnetic source imagingNeuroscienceNeuroimagingElectroencephalographyPositron emission tomography

摘要: Publisher Summary This chapter discusses megnetocephalography and magnetic source imaging. Neuromagnetic recordings offer several advantages over alternative noninvasive imaging modalities. Magnetoencephalography (MEG), as with electroencephalography (EEG), provides for real-time, direct assessment of brain electrophysiology. MEG, therefore, an important complement to structural modalities such computed tomography (CT) resonance (MRI) hemodynamic metabolic techniques functional MRI (fMRI), positron emission (PET), single-photon (SPECT). MEG affords certain EEG. The most salient these is that neuromagnetic signals penetrate the skull scalp without significant distortion. spatial resolution higher than EEG, mathematical analyses pattern field can accurate localization neurons responsible generating signals. Of available neuroimaging techniques, best balance temporal sensitivity physiology.

参考文章(66)
John P. Wikswo, Cellular Action Currents Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 173- 207 ,(1983) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-1785-3_8
H Weinberg, D Crisp, D Cheyne, Electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic studies of motor function Advances in Neurology. ,vol. 54, pp. 193- 205 ,(1990)
R. Hari, The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex Advances in audiology. ,vol. 6, pp. 222- 282 ,(1990)
U. Ribary, R. Llinas, A. Kluger, J. Suk, S. H. Ferris, Neuropathological Dynamics of Magnetic, Auditory Steady-State Responses in Alzheimer’s Disease Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 311- 314 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-0581-1_64
R. A. Armstrong, B. Janday, A. Slaven, G. F. A. Harding, The use of flash and pattern evoked fields in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease 7th International Conference on Biomagnetism. pp. 315- 318 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-0581-1_65
Harold H. Morris, Hans Lüders, Joseph F. Hahn, Ronald P. Lesser, Dudley S. Dinner, Melinda L. Estes, Neurophysiological techniques as an aid to surgical treatment of primary brain tumors Annals of Neurology. ,vol. 19, pp. 559- 567 ,(1986) , 10.1002/ANA.410190607
Gary P. Jacobson, B.K. Ahmad, John Moran, Craig W. Newman, Norman Tepley, Jeanne Wharton, Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100—M200) measurements in tinnitus and normal groups Hearing Research. ,vol. 56, pp. 44- 52 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90152-Y
L. Leinonen, S.-L. Joutsiniemi, Auditory evoked potentials and magnetic fields in patients with lesions of the auditory cortex. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 79, pp. 316- 325 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1600-0404.1989.TB03792.X
Timothy J. Teyler, B.Neil Cuffin, David Cohen, The visual evoked magnetoencephalogram. Life Sciences. ,vol. 17, pp. 683- 691 ,(1975) , 10.1016/0024-3205(75)90522-6
A A Ioannides, J P R Bolton, C J S Clarke, Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem Inverse Problems. ,vol. 6, pp. 523- 542 ,(1990) , 10.1088/0266-5611/6/4/005