Effective, Robust Design of Community Mitigation for Pandemic Influenza: A Systematic Examination of Proposed US Guidance

作者: Victoria J. Davey , Robert J. Glass , H. Jason Min , Walter E. Beyeler , Laura M. Glass

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0002606

关键词: Community resilienceH5N1 vaccineStrategy implementationPandemicGovernmentPopulationSocial distancePsychological interventionGerontologyMedicineRisk analysis (engineering)General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesGeneral Medicine

摘要: Background: The US government proposes pandemic influenza mitigation guidance that includes isolation and antiviral treatment of ill persons, voluntary household member quarantine prophylaxis, social distancing individuals, school closure, reduction contacts at work, prioritized vaccination. Is this the best strategy combination? choice robust to uncertainties? What are critical enablers community resilience? Methods Findings: We systematically simulate a broad range scenarios strategies using networked, agent-based model explicit, multiply-overlapping contact networks. evaluate illness societal burden for alterations in networks, parameters, or intervention implementation. For 1918like pandemic, minimizes ,1% population combines network-based (e.g. all with adults’ work reduced), case-based measures prophylaxis members). find removal enhanced transmission by young, additional complexity altered natural history including extended viral shedding. Administration age-group randomly targeted 50% effective pre-pandemic vaccine 7% coverage (current H5N1 stockpile) had minimal effect on outcomes. In order, success depends rapid implementation, high compliance, regional mitigation, rigorous rescinding criteria; these resilience. Conclusions: Systematic evaluation feasible, recommended interventions generally confirms yields choices planning wide uncertainty. network- interventions; paramount. Because must be applied rapidly, regionally, stringently greatest benefit, preparation public education is required long-lasting, compliance during pandemic.

参考文章(29)
Update on avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection in humans. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 358, pp. 261- 273 ,(2008) , 10.1056/NEJMRA0707279
A.C. Hurt, P. Selleck, N. Komadina, R. Shaw, L. Brown, I.G. Barr, Susceptibility of highly pathogenic A(H5N1) avian influenza viruses to the neuraminidase inhibitors and adamantanes. Antiviral Research. ,vol. 73, pp. 228- 231 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ANTIVIRAL.2006.10.004
Martin I. Meltzer, Pandemic influenza, reopening schools, and returning to work. Emerging Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 14, pp. 509- 510 ,(2008) , 10.3201/EID1403.080026
Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin, Paul W Selleck, Tri Bhakti Usman, Michael A Johnson, None, Reduced sensitivity of influenza A (H5N1) to oseltamivir. Emerging Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 13, pp. 1354- 1357 ,(2007) , 10.3201/EID1309.07-0164
Christina E. Mills, James M. Robins, Marc Lipsitch, Transmissibility of 1918 pandemic influenza Nature. ,vol. 432, pp. 904- 906 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NATURE03063
M.G Roberts, M Baker, L.C Jennings, G Sertsou, N Wilson, A model for the spread and control of pandemic influenza in an isolated geographical region Journal of the Royal Society Interface. ,vol. 4, pp. 325- 330 ,(2007) , 10.1098/RSIF.2006.0176
Neil M. Ferguson, Derek A. T. Cummings, Christophe Fraser, James C. Cajka, Philip C. Cooley, Donald S. Burke, Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic Nature. ,vol. 442, pp. 448- 452 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NATURE04795
Victoria J. Davey, Robert J. Glass, Rescinding community mitigation strategies in an influenza pandemic. Emerging Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 14, pp. 365- 372 ,(2008) , 10.3201/EID1403.070673
Laura M Glass, Robert J Glass, Social contact networks for the spread of pandemic influenza in children and teenagers. BMC Public Health. ,vol. 8, pp. 61- 61 ,(2008) , 10.1186/1471-2458-8-61