Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.

作者: Devidas Menon , Tania Stafinski

DOI: 10.1586/ERP.10.82

关键词: Public involvementMedicinePublic relationsPatient preferenceKey informantsDeveloped countryHealth technologyHealthcare systemPublic participation

摘要: Health technology assessment (HTA) has become an integral part of decision-making on the coverage new health technologies in most systems developed world. In recent years, pressure to involve patients and members public HTA grown. this article, we summarize findings from peer-reviewed ‘gray’ literature, discussions with key informants determine potential roles for decision-making. We also existing both groups jurisdictions. Although there appears be a general view that involvement is highly desirable, research offering insights into effectiveness different approaches accomplish scarce. Nonetheless, many agencies countries have established some mechanism seeking input or their processes.

参考文章(34)
Corinna Sorenson, The role of HTA in coverage and pricing decisions: a cross-country comparison European Observatory on Health. ,(2009)
Francois-Pierre Gauvin, Julia Abelson, Mita Giacomini, John Eyles, John N. Lavis, "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 70, pp. 1518- 1526 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2010.01.036
Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, John Eyles, Ann Casebeer, Elisabeth Martin, Gail Mackean, Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 64, pp. 2115- 2128 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2007.01.013
Karen Facey, Antoine Boivin, Javier Gracia, Helle Ploug Hansen, Alessandra Lo Scalzo, Jean Mossman, Ann Single, Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. ,vol. 26, pp. 334- 340 ,(2010) , 10.1017/S0266462310000395
Henry Z. Borowski, Jon Brehaut, David Hailey, Linking evidence from health technology assessments to policy and decision making: the Alberta model. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. ,vol. 23, pp. 155- 161 ,(2007) , 10.1017/S0266462307070250
Julia Abelson, John Eyles, Christopher B McLeod, Patricia Collins, Colin McMullan, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy. ,vol. 66, pp. 95- 106 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00048-4
Jackie M. Street, Annette J. Braunack-Mayer, Karen Facey, Richard E. Ashcroft, Janet E. Hiller, Virtual community consultation? Using the literature and weblogs to link community perspectives and health technology assessment. Health Expectations. ,vol. 11, pp. 189- 200 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2007.00484.X
David Hailey, Margareta Nordwall, Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. ,vol. 22, pp. 497- 499 ,(2006) , 10.1017/S0266462306051427