Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: II. Is a sender sensitive to the presence and nature of a receiver?

作者: Peter Marler , Alfred Dufty , Roberta Pickert

DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(86)90023-0

关键词: CommunicationSocial psychologyAutomaticityReferentVocal communicationDeceptionPsychologyCommunication sourceAnimal communicationSignal productionAnimal Science and ZoologyEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

摘要: Abstract As a test of the automaticity food calling behaviour cockerels, their sensitivity to presence and nature an audience was explored. Males were presented with either highly preferred or non-food item in familiar female, strange male, no at all. With as referent, there significantly less than females, even male potential receiver. There significant amount for item, especially female. Food non-foods certain social contexts is discussed case deception. The modulation signal production according receiver considered relation issue intentionality animal communication.

参考文章(7)
R. Dawkins, J. R. Krebs, Animal signals: information or manipulation? Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. ,(1978)
Colin Beer, Motives and Metaphors in Considerations of Animal Nature Springer, New York, NY. pp. 125- 140 ,(1983) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-5590-1_9
Daniel C. Dennett, Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The 'panglossian paradigm' defended Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 6, pp. 343- 355 ,(1983) , 10.1017/S0140525X00016393
Donald R. Griffin, Charles E. Rice, The question of animal awareness ,(1976)