作者: Komla Tsey , Leigh-ann Onnis , Mary Whiteside , Janya McCalman , Megan Williams
DOI: 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.01.004
关键词: Context (language use) 、 Public relations 、 Impact assessment 、 Applied economics 、 Societal impact of nanotechnology 、 Government 、 Indigenous 、 Empowerment 、 Political science 、 Productivity 、 Strategy and Management 、 Geography, Planning and Development 、 Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 、 Business and International Management 、 Social psychology (sociology)
摘要: Researchers worldwide are increasingly reporting the societal impact of their research as part national productivity assessments. However, challenges they encounter in developing case studies against specified government assessment criteria and how pitfalls can be mitigated not reported. This paper examines key steps taken to develop an Aboriginal Family Wellbeing (FWB) empowerment study context Australian Research Council (ARC) pilot exercise involved applying ARC criteria. The requirement that researchers demonstrate institutions support them conduct impactful has potential create supportive environments for more responsive needs users outside academia. 15-year reference period associated underpinning reported focus on researcher's current institutional affiliation constitute constraints demonstrating true research. For working with Indigenous people, relationships build over long periods time, irrespective university affiliation, critical conducting A open-ended time-frame, no restrictions 'associated research' provides best opportunity benefits only people but society broadly.