Monaural masking release in random-phase and low-noise noise.

作者: David A. Eddins

DOI: 10.1121/1.1352083

关键词: Intensity discriminationMonauralLow noiseDetection theoryIn degreeProfile analysisMathematicsAcoustics

摘要: Two masking-release paradigms thought to involve across-channel processing are comodulation masking release (CMR) and profile analysis. Similarities between these two were explored by comparing signal detection in maskers that varied only degree of envelope fluctuation. The narrow-band-noise 10 Hz wide their fluctuations manipulated using the low-noise noise algorithm Pumplin [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 100–104 (1985)]. Masking conditions included classic CMR an on-frequency band, multiple (five) incoherent bands, or coherent bands. Detection was compared both random-phase (RPN) (LNN) maskers. In one set conditions, identical masker, yielding intensity discrimination task. Conditions RPN tonal signals resembled paradigm, whereas including LNN more closely analysis paradigm. Other may be considered hybrids. This combination provided a variety within- cues for detection. results suggest could based upon same stimulus perhaps perceptual processes.

参考文章(26)
AJ Oxenham, van der Ml Heijden, AG Armin Kohlrausch, Rwl Kortekaas, R Fassel, D Püschel, van de Sljde Steven Par, Detection of tones in low-noise noise : further evidence for the role of envelope fluctuations Acustica. ,vol. 83, pp. 659- 669 ,(1997)
Deborah A. Fantini, Brian C. J. Moore, A comparison of the effectiveness of across-channel cues available in comodulation masking release and profile analysis tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 96, pp. 3451- 3462 ,(1994) , 10.1121/1.411451
Brian C. J. Moore, Brian R. Glasberg, Gregory P. Schooneveldt, Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 87, pp. 1683- 1694 ,(1990) , 10.1121/1.399416
Deborah A. Fantini, Brian C. J. Moore, Gregory P. Schooneveldt, Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 93, pp. 2106- 2115 ,(1993) , 10.1121/1.406697
Deborah A. Fantini, Brian C. J. Moore, Profile analysis and comodulation detection differences using narrow bands of noise and their relation to comodulation masking release. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 95, pp. 2180- 2191 ,(1994) , 10.1121/1.408678
Jesko Verhey, Torsten Dau, Modeling comodulation masking release (CMR) effects with a single‐channel analysis Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 100, pp. 2625- 2625 ,(1996) , 10.1121/1.417710
David A. Eddins, Beverly A. Wright, Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 96, pp. 3432- 3442 ,(1994) , 10.1121/1.411450
So/ren Buus, Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 78, pp. 1958- 1965 ,(1985) , 10.1121/1.392652
John H. Grose, Joseph W. Hall, Comodulation masking release using SAM tonal complex maskers: Effects of modulation depth and signal position Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 85, pp. 1276- 1284 ,(1989) , 10.1121/1.397458