Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations

作者: F. Bolzoni , E. Jankowska

DOI: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2014.285940

关键词: HindlimbNeuroscienceSpinal cordStimulationIntracellularNucleusPostsynaptic potentialFacilitationNeurotransmissionChemistry

摘要: Key points Trans-spinal DC stimulation affects both postsynaptic neurons and the presynaptic axons providing input to these neurons. In present study, we show that intraspinally applied cathodal current replicates effects of trans-spinal direct in deeply anaesthetized animals spinal during actual application a post-polarization period. Presynaptic local polarization were expressed an increase excitability skin afferents (in dorsal horn) group Ia motor nuclei), at least 30 min after application. However, although facilitation (i.e. more effective) activation motoneurons by stimuli nucleus was very potent application, it only negligible once discontinued. The results suggest prolonged are primarily associated with changes synaptic transmission. Abstract The study aimed compare actions cord, focusing on primary motoneurons. To reduce directly affected cord region, weak polarizing (0.1–0.3 μA) locally cats rats; within hindlimb nuclei caudal lumbar segments, or horn terminal projection area low threshold afferents. Changes activated intraspinal (20–50 μA) estimated using increases decreases compound action potentials recorded from roots peripheral nerves as their measure. assessed intracellularly monosynaptic EPSPs extracellular field (evoked nuclei, cutaneous horn). The intracellular records motoneuronal discharges ventral root muscle nerve. Cathodal found affect them different extent. markedly increased involve some actions, but negligibly themselves. Taken together, indicate long-lasting activity induced reflects transmission.

参考文章(59)
Michael A. Nitsche, Florian Müller-Dahlhaus, Walter Paulus, Ulf Ziemann, The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non‐invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs The Journal of Physiology. ,vol. 590, pp. 4641- 4662 ,(2012) , 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2012.232975
Tracy. L. Baker-Herman, Gordon S. Mitchell, Phrenic Long-Term Facilitation Requires Spinal Serotonin Receptor Activation and Protein Synthesis The Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 22, pp. 6239- 6246 ,(2002) , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-06239.2002
Alberto Priori, Matteo Ciocca, Marta Parazzini, Maurizio Vergari, Roberta Ferrucci, Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists The Journal of Physiology. ,vol. 592, pp. 3345- 3369 ,(2014) , 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2013.270280
Peter K. Toshev, Berkan Guleyupoglu, Marom Bikson, Informing dose design by modeling transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 125, pp. 2147- 2149 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CLINPH.2014.03.022
Hiroyuki Nodera, Ryuji Kaji, Nerve excitability testing and its clinical application to neuromuscular diseases Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 117, pp. 1902- 1916 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.CLINPH.2006.01.018
William J. Roberts, Dean O. Smith, Analysis of Threshold Currents during Myostimulation of Fibres in the Spinal Cord Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 89, pp. 384- 394 ,(1973) , 10.1111/J.1748-1716.1973.TB05533.X
J. C. Eccles, Rosamond M. Eccles, F. Magni, Central inhibitory action attributable to presynaptic depolarization produced by muscle afferent volleys. The Journal of Physiology. ,vol. 159, pp. 147- 166 ,(1961) , 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.1961.SP006798
V. Reggie Edgerton, Soo J. Kim, Ronaldo M. Ichiyama, Yuri P. Gerasimenko, Roland R. Roy, Rehabilitative therapies after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. ,vol. 23, pp. 560- 570 ,(2006) , 10.1089/NEU.2006.23.560