Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review.

作者: Edward Azavedo , Sophia Zackrisson , Ingegerd Mejàre , Marianne Heibert Arnlind

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-22

关键词: Cochrane LibraryMedical physicsMammographyReading (process)Inclusion and exclusion criteriaCADMass screeningMammography screeningDouble readingMedicine

摘要: In accordance with European guidelines, mammography screening comprises independent readings by two breast radiologists (double reading). CAD (computer-aided detection) has been suggested to complement or replace one of the readers (single reading + CAD). The aim this systematic review is address following question: Is reading mammographic x-ray images a single radiologist together at least as accurate double reading? electronic literature search included databases Pub Med, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers assessed abstracts full-text articles. 1049 were identified, which 996 excluded reference inclusion exclusion criteria; 53 articles for eligibility. Finally, four in qualitative analysis, GRADE synthesis. scientific evidence insufficient determine whether accuracy reading + CAD equivalent that obtained standard practice, i.e. where independently read images.

参考文章(72)
Consumer Protection, E. Puthaar, N. Perry, European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis Amendoeira, I; et al (2013). European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Belgium: European Commission.. pp. 1- 160 ,(2013) , 10.5167/UZH-84270
Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2013, ,(2013) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.PUB5
R. Chersevani, S. Ciatto, C. Del Favero, A. Frigerio, L. Giordano, G. Giuseppetti, C. Naldoni, P. Panizza, M. Petrella, G. Saguatti, "CADEAT": considerations on the use of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography. Radiologia Medica. ,vol. 115, pp. 563- 570 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11547-010-0505-4
E Azavedo, G Svane, Radiologic aspects of breast cancers detected through a breast cancer screening program. European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 13, pp. 88- 90 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0720-048X(91)90086-B
Fiona J. Gilbert, Susan M. Astley, Magnus A. McGee, Maureen G. C. Gillan, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Pamela M. Griffiths, Stephen W. Duffy, Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology. ,vol. 241, pp. 47- 53 ,(2006) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2411051092
Stefano Ciatto, Marco Rosselli Del Turco, Gabriella Risso, Sandra Catarzi, Rita Bonardi, Valeria Viterbo, Pierangela Gnutti, Barbara Guglielmoni, Lelio Pinelli, Anna Pandiscia, Francesco Navarra, Adele Lauria, Rosa Palmiero, Pietro Luigi Indovina, Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 45, pp. 135- 138 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00011-6
Frank J.H.M. van den Biggelaar, Alphons G.H. Kessels, Jos M.A. van Engelshoven, Karin Flobbe, Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population International Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 125, pp. 2923- 2929 ,(2009) , 10.1002/IJC.24632
S Ciatto, M Rosselli Del Turco, P Burke, C Visioli, E Paci, M Zappa, Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 89, pp. 1645- 1649 ,(2003) , 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6601356