The dexmedetomidine "augmented" sedato analgesic cocktail: An effective approach for sedation in prolonged endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

作者: Sandip Mukhopadhyay , Mausumi Niyogi , Joydip Sarkar , BasabdattaSamanta Mukhopadhyay , SwapanKumar Halder

DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.155149

关键词: KetamineAnalgesicGuidelineDexmedetomidineMidazolamSedationMedicinePropofolAnesthesiaSurgeryRegimen

摘要: Background and Aims: In absence of any published standard guideline for sedation or anesthesia practice prolonged therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), safe cost-effective protocol is the need hour. Our study aims to evaluate efficacy a dexmedetomidine as an add-on deep ERCP compare three regimens regarding safety efficacy. Material Methods: Forty-five consecutively enrolled patients planned assumed have procedural duration (>50 min) were divided into groups in randomized assessor blinded fashion. Group 1 received propofol midazolam, 2 sedato-analgesic cocktail containing ketamine-propofol-midazolam-pentazocine, 3 sedate-analgesic plus infusion under monitoring vital parameters according judgment concerned anesthesiologist. Total requirement, episodes gagging, oxygen desaturation, changes mean blood pressure (MBP), recovery satisfaction score endoscopist, anesthetist patient noted analyzed statistically using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction Chi-square test. Results: Mean incidences gagging desaturation was significantly less compared 1. MBP more stable faster 3. Anesthetist's even Conclusions: The superior conventional propofol-midazolam regimen, increased cocktail. It reduces helps maintain level increases anesthetist.

参考文章(22)
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Pradermchai Kongkam, Sahadol Poonyathawon, Yuwadee Ponauthai, Sakolkan Sumdin, Pinit Kullavanijaya, Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study BMC Anesthesiology. ,vol. 12, pp. 20- 20 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1471-2253-12-20
Mohammed A. Qadeer, John J. Vargo, Farah Khandwala, Rocio Lopez, Gregory Zuccaro, Propofol Versus Traditional Sedative Agents for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Meta-analysis Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ,vol. 3, pp. 1049- 1056 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1542-3565(05)00742-1
Irene G Chainaki, Maria M Manolaraki, Gregorios A Paspatis, Deep sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ,vol. 3, pp. 34- 39 ,(2011) , 10.4253/WJGE.V3.I2.34
R. M. Venn, C. J. Bradshaw, R. Spencer, D. Brealey, E. Caudwell, C. Naughton, A. Vedio, M. Singer, R. Feneck, D. Treacher, S. M. Willatts, R. M. Grounds, Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. ,vol. 54, pp. 1136- 1142 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1365-2044.1999.01114.X
Jaakko Levanen, Marja-Leena Makela, Harry Scheinin, Dexmedetomidine Premedication Attenuates Ketamine-induced Cardiostimulatory Effects and Postanesthetic Delirium Anesthesiology. ,vol. 82, pp. 1117- 1125 ,(1995) , 10.1097/00000542-199505000-00005