The use of statistical tools in field testing of putative effects of genetically modified plants on nontarget organisms.

作者: Alexander V. Semenov , Jan Dirk van Elsas , Debora C. M. Glandorf , Menno Schilthuizen , Willem F. de Boer

DOI: 10.1002/ECE3.640

关键词: Replication (statistics)Statistical hypothesis testingField (computer science)Decision treeStatistical modelExperimental dataComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceData miningStatistical powerPseudoreplication

摘要: To fulfill existing guidelines, applicants that aim to place their genetically modified (GM) insect-resistant crop plants on the market are required provide data from field experiments address potential impacts of GM nontarget organisms (NTO's). Such may be based varied experimental designs. The recent EFSA guidance document for environmental risk assessment (2010) does not clear and structured suggestions statistics trials effects NTO's. This review examines practices in plant testing such as way randomization, replication, pseudoreplication. Emphasis is placed importance design features used which NTO's assessed. statistical power positive negative aspects various models discussed. Equivalence difference compared, checking distribution stressed decide selection proper model. While continuous (e.g., pH temperature) classical approaches – example, analysis variance (ANOVA) appropriate, discontinuous (counts) only generalized linear (GLM) shown efficient. There no golden rule test most appropriate any situation. In particular, block designs covariates play a role GLMs should used. Generic advice offered will help both setting up interpretation obtained this testing. combination decision trees checklist trials, provided, analyses assess whether were correctly applied. We offer generic assessors

参考文章(44)
P. J. Cheek, P. McCullagh, J. A. Nelder, Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. Applied Statistics. ,vol. 39, pp. 385- 386 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2347392
Elena N. Ieno, Anatoly A. Saveliev, Neil P. J. Walker, Graham M. Smith, Alain F. Zuur, Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R ,(2009)
David G Clayton, Generalized Linear Mixed Models Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. pp. 845- 852 ,(2003) , 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT07540
Oliver Schabenberger, Francis J. Pierce, Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences ,(2001)
Emma Petiot, Danielle Jacob, Stephane Lanthier, Verena Lohr, Sven Ansorge, Amine A Kamen, Metabolic and Kinetic analyses of influenza production in perfusion HEK293 cell culture BMC Biotechnology. ,vol. 11, pp. 1- 12 ,(2011) , 10.1186/1472-6750-11-84
M Schilthuizen, B J Scott, A S Cabanban, P G Craze, Population structure and coil dimorphism in a tropical land snail. Heredity. ,vol. 95, pp. 216- 220 ,(2005) , 10.1038/SJ.HDY.6800715
Marta de la Poza, Xavier Pons, Gema P. Farinós, Carmen López, Félix Ortego, Matilde Eizaguirre, Pedro Castañera, Ramon Albajes, Impact of farm-scale Bt maize on abundance of predatory arthropods in Spain Crop Protection. ,vol. 24, pp. 677- 684 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CROPRO.2004.12.003
Scott H. Stoleson, Todd E. Ristau, David S. deCalesta, Stephen B. Horsley, Ten-year response of bird communities to an operational herbicide–shelterwood treatment in a northern hardwood forest Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 262, pp. 1205- 1214 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2011.06.017
D. Bonte, J. M. J. Travis, N. De Clercq, I. Zwertvaegher, L. Lens, Thermal conditions during juvenile development affect adult dispersal in a spider. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 105, pp. 17000- 17005 ,(2008) , 10.1073/PNAS.0806830105
A. Auclerc, J.F. Ponge, S. Barot, F. Dubs, Experimental assessment of habitat preference and dispersal ability of soil springtails Soil Biology & Biochemistry. ,vol. 41, pp. 1596- 1604 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2009.04.017