The response of rodents to scent marks: Four broad hypotheses

作者: Michael H. Ferkin

DOI: 10.1016/J.YHBEH.2014.10.002

关键词: MicrotusContext (language use)BiologyCommunicationBehavioral neuroscienceEndocrinologyEndocrine and Autonomic Systems

摘要: This article is part of a Special Issue "Chemosignals and Reproduction". Many terrestrial mammals must be able to distinguish between the myriad scent marks they encounter in order for them facilitate or deter direct interactions with their donors. I review studies that examine how rodents, mainly meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), respond when conspecifics heterospecifics, context, as well age condition senders receivers, affect responses. The uses four broad hypotheses discuss response rodents marks. are follows: 1) Scent convey accurate information receiver about sender's state phenotype genotype. 2) individually distinct. 3) receivers flexible would modulated by cognitive abilities receivers. 4) Receivers contained conveyed mark manner will increase survival fitness. cited this show signal phenotype, genotype, condition, which use among different doing so, tailor accordingly Thus, may serve guide our understanding provide conceptual framework future research development additional hypotheses.

参考文章(151)
Toni E. Ziegler, Daniel J. Wittwer, Charles T. Snowdon, Circulating and excreted hormones during the ovarian cycle in the cotton-top tamarin,Saguinus oedipus American Journal of Primatology. ,vol. 31, pp. 55- 65 ,(1993) , 10.1002/AJP.1350310106
Foteos Macrides, Andrew N. Clancy, Alan G. Singer, William C. Agosta, Male hamster investigatory and copulatory responses to vaginal discharge: an attempt to impart sexual significance to an arbitrary chemosensory stimulus. Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 33, pp. 627- 632 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90382-2
Frank A Beach, Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals Hormones and Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 105- 138 ,(1976) , 10.1016/0018-506X(76)90008-8
Karin S. Newman, Zuleyma Tang Halpin, Individual odours and mate recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 36, pp. 1779- 1787 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80117-9
Robert E. Johnston, Teresa A. Bullock, Individual recognition by use of odours in golden hamsters: the nature of individual representations Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 61, pp. 545- 557 ,(2001) , 10.1006/ANBE.2000.1637
Peter M Kappeler, None, To whom it may concern : the transmission and function of chemical signals in Lemur catta Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 42, pp. 411- 421 ,(1998) , 10.1007/S002650050455
Jerry O. Wolff, Stephen G. Mech, Shawn A. Thomas, Scent Marking in Female Prairie Voles: a Test of Alternative Hypotheses Ethology. ,vol. 108, pp. 483- 494 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1439-0310.2002.00788.X
Angeldeep W Kaur, Tobias Ackels, Tsung-Han Kuo, Annika Cichy, Sandeepa Dey, Cristen Hays, Maria Kateri, Darren W Logan, Tobias F Marton, Marc Spehr, Lisa Stowers, None, Murine Pheromone Proteins Constitute a Context-Dependent Combinatorial Code Governing Multiple Social Behaviors Cell. ,vol. 157, pp. 676- 688 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CELL.2014.02.025
Aras Petrulis, Molly Weidner, Robert E Johnston, Recognition of competitors by male golden hamsters. Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 81, pp. 629- 638 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2004.03.001