Silodosin: An Update on Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Indications in Urology.

作者: Luca Villa , Paolo Capogrosso , Umberto Capitanio , Alberto Martini , Alberto Briganti

DOI: 10.1007/S12325-018-0854-2

关键词: UrologyMedicineTamsulosinUrinary retentionLower urinary tract symptomsBladder outlet obstructionSilodosinRandomized controlled trialPlaceboProstate cancer

摘要: Silodosin determines smooth muscle relaxation in bladder and prostate tissues, increases blood flow conditions of chronic ischemia regulates the activity transcriptional factors responsible for stromal growth hyperplasia. Phase III trials have already demonstrated efficacy safety silodosin treatment patients bothered by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We aimed describe rationality use summarize current literature on LUTS. PubMed Web Science were queried with terms: ‘silodosin’ combination (AND) terms ‘lower symptoms’, ‘LUTS’, ‘pathophysiology’, ‘symptoms’ OR ‘therapy’. Studies published last 10 years (2007–2017) adults core clinical journals English included. 8 mg once-daily was superior placebo improving IPSS total score, voiding subscore, storage subscore QoL at least as effective tamsulosin 0.4 mg all analyses. In addition, studies assessing effect urodynamic parameters showed that determined a higher improvement outlet obstruction index compared other alpha1 adrenergic receptor antagonists. Concerning profile, long-term data (after 9 months treatment) confirmed limited cardiovascular gastrointestinal systems. Although ejaculatory disorders represented main complaint taking silodosin, discontinuation rate due this condition remained low even follow-up study (7.5%). Encouraging findings may be administered medical expulsive therapy promoting spontaneous stone passage distal ureteral stones < 10 mm, relieve LUTS who underwent cancer brachytherapy increase likelihood successful without catheter experiencing acute retention. is one drugs approved BPH, being highly not only but also parameter impairments BPH. Moreover, it has shown stones previous prospective randomized trials. Sponsorship article processing charges funded Recordati.

参考文章(82)
Thomas C. Fenter, Muta M. Issa, Eric J. Kruep, Libby Black, Amy L. Grogg, An assessment of the diagnosed prevalence of diseases in men 50 years of age or older. The American Journal of Managed Care. ,vol. 12, ,(2006)
Hideshi Miyakita, Eiji Yokoyama, Yasutada Onodera, Takuji Utsunomiya, Masatoshi Tokunaga, Takanori Tojo, Noriteru Fujii, Shuichi Yanada, Short-term effects of crossover treatment with silodosin and tamsulosin hydrochloride for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 17, pp. 869- 875 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2010.02614.X
Tomonori Yamanishi, Kanya Kaga, Miki Fuse, Chiharu Shibata, Takao Kamai, Tomoyuki Uchiyama, Six-year follow up of silodosin monotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: What are the factors for continuation or withdrawal? International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 22, pp. 1143- 1148 ,(2015) , 10.1111/IJU.12915
Seiya Inoue, Motoaki Saito, Panagiota Tsounapi, Fotios Dimitriadis, Fumiya Ohmasa, Yukako Kinoshita, Keisuke Satoh, Atsushi Takenaka, Effect of silodosin on detrusor overactivity in the male spontaneously hypertensive rat BJUI. ,vol. 110, ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2011.10814.X
Toshiro Shirakawa, Takahiro Haraguchi, Katsumi Shigemura, Shinichi Morishita, Kohji Minayoshi, Jiro Miyazaki, Yuji Yamada, Hideaki Miyake, Kazushi Tanaka, Masato Fujisawa, Silodosin versus naftopidil in Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized multicenter study International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 20, pp. 903- 910 ,(2013) , 10.1111/IJU.12055
Yasunori Itoh, Atsushi Okada, Takahiro Yasui, Shuzo Hamamoto, Masahito Hirose, Yoshiyuki Kojima, Keiichi Tozawa, Shoichi Sasaki, Kenjiro Kohri, Efficacy of selective α1A adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin in the medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 18, pp. no- no ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2011.02810.X
Yasuo Tsuzaka, Hisashi Matsushima, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, Yukio Homma, Naftopidil vs silodosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: A randomized controlled study in Japanese male patients International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 18, pp. 792- 795 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2011.02850.X
L Villa, R Buono, N Fossati, P Rigatti, F Montorsi, F Benigni, P Hedlund, Effects by silodosin on the partially obstructed rat ureter in vivo and on human and rat isolated ureters British Journal of Pharmacology. ,vol. 169, pp. 230- 238 ,(2013) , 10.1111/BPH.12123
P. Capogrosso, A. Serino, E. Ventimiglia, L. Boeri, F. Dehò, R. Damiano, A. Briganti, F. Montorsi, A. Salonia, Effects of silodosin on sexual function – realistic picture from the everyday clinical practice Journal of Andrology. ,vol. 3, pp. 1076- 1081 ,(2015) , 10.1111/ANDR.12095