Writing together, learning together: the value and effectiveness of a research writing group for doctoral students

作者: Zui Neofa , Carly J. Lassig , Carmel M. Diezmann , Jillian L. Fox , Lisette H. Dillon

DOI:

关键词: PedagogyCollaborative writingThematic analysisAcademic writingFacilitatorPeer learningProfessional writingSocial learningParagraphPsychology

摘要: The high level of scholarly writing required for a doctoral thesis is challenge many research students. However, formal academic training not core component programs. Informal groups students may be one method contributing to the improvement writing. In this paper, we report on group that was initiated by an experienced writer and higher degree supervisor support improve her students’ capabilities. Over time, developed workable model suit their varying needs circumstances. comprised sessions, email group, individual Here, use narrative approach explore effectiveness value our in improving data consisted reflections stimulus questions about progress experiences. sought probe concerns own writing, what they had learned benefits disadvantages challenges participation. These were analysed using thematic analysis. Following analysis, provided perspective key themes emerged. Results revealed that, through members technical elements (e.g., paragraph structure), non-technical working within limited timeframes), conceptual constructing cohesive arguments), collaborative processes, how edit respond feedback. addition improved quality, other opportunities shared experiences, peer support, increased confidence motivation. provides unique social learning environment with for: professional dialogue review, developing supportive network. Thus has proved effective avenue building capability writing. The proposed could applicable any context, regardless type location university, university faculty, program structure, or number postgraduate It also used diverse abilities, needs, topics methodologies. it requires facilitator sufficient expertise experience supervision who can both engage planned activities capitalise fruitful lines discussion related as arise. intended replace traditional processes nor existing training. However clear programs particularly era rapidly increasing student load.

参考文章(12)
Paul Atkinson, Odette Parry, Sara Delamont, Supervising the Phd: A Guide to Success ,(1997)
Christine Räisänen, Lennart A. Björk, Academic writing : a university writing course Published in <b>2003</b> in Lund by Studentlitteratur. ,(2003)
Catherine Kohler Riessman, Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences ,(2007)
Carmel M. Diezmann, Supervision and scholarly writing: writing to learn—learning to write Reflective Practice. ,vol. 6, pp. 443- 457 ,(2005) , 10.1080/14623940500300491
Carol A. Mullen, The Need for a Curricular Writing Model for Graduate Students Journal of Further and Higher Education. ,vol. 25, pp. 117- 126 ,(2001) , 10.1080/03098770020030551
Claire Aitchison, Alison Lee, Research writing: problems and pedagogies Teaching in Higher Education. ,vol. 11, pp. 265- 278 ,(2006) , 10.1080/13562510600680574
Patricia A. Alexander, The Development of Expertise: The Journey From Acclimation to Proficiency Educational Researcher. ,vol. 32, pp. 10- 14 ,(2003) , 10.3102/0013189X032008010
Carol A. Mullen, The WIT cohort: A case study of informal doctoral mentoring Journal of Further and Higher Education. ,vol. 27, pp. 411- 426 ,(2003) , 10.1080/0309877032000128109
Rosemary S. Caffarella, Bruce G. Barnett, Teaching Doctoral Students to Become Scholarly Writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques Studies in Higher Education. ,vol. 25, pp. 39- 52 ,(2000) , 10.1080/030750700116000